G
guanophore
Guest
Rom 8:26-27Between the speaker and God? If he does not know what he is saying then why is this important?
26 Likewise the Spirit helps us in our weakness; for we do not know how to pray as we ought, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us with sighs too deep for words. 27 And he who searches the hearts of men knows what is the mind of the Spirit, because the Spirit intercedes for the saints according to the will of God.
It is a way to pray when one does not know how to pray as one ought.
1 Cor 14:3-4
4 He who speaks in a tongue edifies himself,
It is also a way to build up ones Spiritual strength, as any prayer would do.
It is also a way to let the mind rest while the Spirit prays in and through us:
1 Cor 14:14
14 For if I pray in a tongue, my spirit prays but my mind is unfruitful.
Which is very helpful for those of us whose heads have a way of interfereing with our prayers.
It is the same as when words are not necessary during contemplation - one is in the presence of God, and the Holy Spirit prays THROUGH the person.
Yes, there is a form of tongues that is written about in the NT that relates to known languages.I had never heard of this phenomenon until a few years ago and from my research until about 1830 it was the general consensus that tongues was a foreign language,not a special language between the prayer and God.
Indeed, one should not open one’s heart and mind to those things that are not of God.Until I am certain that some of these prayer experiences are not the kundalini spirit.I remain quite guarded and skeptical.
I find this position to be absurd. I agree that the fullness of public revelation is found in Chirst, but if there is no place for the Spiritual gifts, why did He give them to the Church?There is no new revelation, so prophesies have nothing to offer us. We know everything we need to know.
You are invalidating all of the Saints and mystics of the Church!
I don’t see how any faithful Catholic can deny the value of the works of St. John of the Cross and St. Teresa of Avila (who speaks often of the charismatic gifts).
Actually, I am not sure this is true. It may be that they spoke in their own language, but it was heard by others in theirs. This has happened at other times throughout history.Secondly, the Apostles spoke in foreign tongues, and people from every nation understood them.
I think you have missed the mark there. The epistle of Paul to the Corinthians demonstrates that what you are saying is not entirely true.This is evident by the same verses you reference. Until this protestant incursion into Catholicism, no one thought this was in reference to speaking in incomprehensible babel.
Such a statement is a direct contradiction to the Holy Scriptures.I don’t trust it. It’s way too easy to fake. Speaking in an “unknown” tongue is also just completely pointless.
Well, we all have room to grow, do we not? The Protestants did not “invent speaking in tongues”. It is a gift of the Holy Spirit.But before the protestants invented speaking in tongues like we know today, we thought speaking in tongues meant speaking in foreign tongues.
There has been a lot of abuse of this gift (one of the reasons that Paul was writing to the Church in Corinth). But never did Paul invalidate the gift.