I wasn’t accusing anyone in particular, although what brought it to mind was a thread on fasting where one person was asking for advise on fasting, several people gave varied good advise on how to fast, then one fellow chimed in that the only way to fast was an absolute fast and all other fasts were not really fasts. Frankly, he sounded prideful about how great his fasting was and disdainful of anyone who didn’t measure up to his high standards.
That was me. It’s ironic that I would be accused of pride in a roundabout way because it seems I never talk about how I pray, keep Sabbath, fail to go to confession and the other sins I commit (lust is a big one for me). It seems I am always on the defensive in that I am going to vote for a candidate who won’t legislate a law against abortion and so forth. Many woulid probably criticize I am in a state of fallen grace for the above and may be right.
I think I was more criticizing “juice fasting”, which is going to have the physiological effect of accelerating hunger by causing great swings in blood glucose. It isn’t going to help matters of fighting hunger. I think I compared it to a “Pepsi Fast” to just make my point that Americans are so used to 3 square meals/day + snacks high in corn syrup, that they don’t realize the human body is designed to go without food for extended periods of time.
Anyway, I guess that was uncalled for.
So, let me one - admit I may be guilty as charged of Capital Sin - Pride.
And two, I hope Catholicism evolves to a less prideful and judgemental group of people (notice I say people, not the religion as meant to be practiced) in the future.
BTW, I only share my fasting point of view here, with others trying to engage in such religious practice. I don’t share my fasts with my patients or friends, just my family.
Okay, my post was a bit defensive and contrite at the same time.
Thank you and God Bless.