People who make up such nonsense have no backing and try to convince with an excess of their own words. They will have to answer to God for it.
“Pope Celestine I, who rendered immortal service to the Church by the overthrow of the Pelagian and Nestorian heresies, and by the imperishable wreath of honour decreed to the Blessed Virgin in the General Council of Ephesus, crowned his pontificate by an act of the most far-reaching consequences for the spread of Christianity and civilization – when he entrusted St. Patrick with the mission of gathering the Irish race into the one fold of Christ.” - C.E.]
Now Seachnall, who was Bishop of Dunshaughlin in Meath, asked the Apostle’s permission to write a hymn in honor of a bishop who was yet alive. St. Patrick answered if he had made up his mind to perform such a duty, that he had need to make his will, as his dissolution was nigh, and that he of all the bishops then in Ireland, would die first.
Wherefore he, without delay, wrote the hymn, and according to Patrick’s prediction, his pure soul, having left the body, mounted up to heaven to possess the unfading crown of glory, for which he so zealously fought the good fight.
And so we know that the writing of this hymn is dated to St. Seachnall’s death.
The hymn, having been finished, the author asked St. Patrick’s leave to read it for him. Our Saint replied, “that he would willingly hear the Lord praised in the works of his servants, or what He has wrought through them.”
Secundinus, apprehending that he might incur the displeasure of Patrick, who disliked human praise, omitted the first stanza in which our Saint’s name occured, and he began on the second. Having proceeded on until he came to the words – “Maximus in regno caetorum,” St. Patrick interrupted him by saying, “how can it be said of a man, that he is the greatest in the kingdom of Heaven?” Seachnall replied – “the superlative degree is used for the positive.” The classical scholar is well aware that such a practice is very usual with Latin writers.
When the reading of the hymn had ended, Secundinus hinted, that it was indited in honor of St. Patrick himself, from whom he expected a fixed reward.
Patrick, though despising human applause, yet not wishing to censure the devout zeal of his discipline, answered: “that Seanchall might expect from the clemency of his Saviour the reward – that whoever morning and evening would devoutly recite the hymn, would obtain a happy death and the reward of glory.” St. Evin adds, that Patrick announced: “that the person reciting the hymn would obtain a happy death, if he were penitent and contrite.”
St. Evin and others have written largely on the wonderful efficacy of the hymn.
Jocelyn says, that the Irish were in the habit of reciting it, and that they experienced its ordinary efficacy, that many reciting this hymn passed unobserved through the enemy’s ranks, though thirsting for their blood.
Here is the hymn, St. Seachnall who died in the year 457 a.d., wrote in honor of St. Patrick, translated literally from the Latin into English. He wrote it shortly before he died, indeed as St. Patrick prophesied.
nothing more saintly than having an affair with a married man who marries you about 15 minutes before your child is born