D
Defensor_Fidei
Guest
In a few other threads I see people mistakenly claim the Status to the SSPX the SSPX does not have.
The fact is that they were given an experimental Status as a “pious union of the faithful” for 6 years in the 70s and that was not renewed after the 6 year period. Since then the SSPX has set up seminaries, ordained priest and bishops against the direct orders of Rome. Their local ordinary has not given them any leeway either. People now mistakenly ascribe that they are a society of priests, which such status has never been granted to them. As such, since the 70s they have been a rogue group that was finally excommunicated.
The fact is that they were given an experimental Status as a “pious union of the faithful” for 6 years in the 70s and that was not renewed after the 6 year period. Since then the SSPX has set up seminaries, ordained priest and bishops against the direct orders of Rome. Their local ordinary has not given them any leeway either. People now mistakenly ascribe that they are a society of priests, which such status has never been granted to them. As such, since the 70s they have been a rogue group that was finally excommunicated.
The Masses [the SSPX] celebrate are also valid, but it is considered **morally illicit ** for the faithful to participate in these Masses unless they are physically or morally impeded from participating in a Mass celebrated by a Catholic priest in good standing (cf. Code of Canon Law, canon 844.2). ** The fact of not being able to assist at the celebration of the so-called “Tridentine” Mass is not considered a sufficient motive for attending such Masses. ** (ECCLESIA DEI)