H
henrikhank
Guest
You say that porn is wrong and I agree. You Catholics then have a big problem explaining why there is porn materials on a Cathedral. Here is an example: youtube.com/watch?v=X6cowE_ywVU
Seriously?You say that porn is wrong and I agree. You Catholics then have a big problem explaining why there is porn materials on a Cathedral. Here is an example: youtube.com/watch?v=X6cowE_ywVU
Anyone aroused by that statue? No, then it’s not porn.You say that porn is wrong and I agree. You Catholics then have a big problem explaining why there is porn materials on a Cathedral. Here is an example: youtube.com/watch?v=X6cowE_ywVU
I’m not even sure what that is showing, to be quite honest.You say that porn is wrong and I agree. You Catholics then have a big problem explaining why there is porn materials on a Cathedral. Here is an example: youtube.com/watch?v=X6cowE_ywVU
Questionable imagery exists on Catholic cathedrals and churches. The work is hundreds of years old, and would be historical censorship to remove or destroy.I seriously doubt that is pornographic. It is probably someone crying into the lap of another person.
Regardless, there was no evidence in the video that this cathedral is Catholic. For another, we don’t even know the name of the cathedral. …