J
Jamie_Burns
Guest
I serve as a volunteer catechist, teaching 10th Graders on 24 Sunday evenings in the school year. I don’t have any formal training as an educator, other than the occasional formation opportunities/workshops offered by our parish and arch-diocese.
The lesson plan that I have formed over the years includes heavy use of passages from Sacred Scripture, along with other tools and activities, but there is a heavy emphasis on the essential questions we discuss having an answer in the Holy Bible.
Every other catechist, and catholic school teacher, and workshop presenter has insisted that when sacred scripture is presented in class, the model needs to be one student (or a series of students for longer passages) reads aloud while the others follow along in the Bible.
This doesn’t seem right to me — and I think that before I started following this “rule” the students connected better with the scriptures.
I get it, that they should be both hearing and reading – some learn better visually, some learn better aurally. But the students reading aloud never deliver the message as effectively as an adult who is familiar with the text delivers it. There is more to delivering meaning than just pronouncing the words.
What is more – this year I have a group of students who don’t seem to WANT to read aloud for the class. None volunteer, I even had one student refuse. If I think the learning process is better served by reading it to them, why fight it?
Moderator: If this is the wrong sub-forum for this thread please feel free to move it.
The lesson plan that I have formed over the years includes heavy use of passages from Sacred Scripture, along with other tools and activities, but there is a heavy emphasis on the essential questions we discuss having an answer in the Holy Bible.
Every other catechist, and catholic school teacher, and workshop presenter has insisted that when sacred scripture is presented in class, the model needs to be one student (or a series of students for longer passages) reads aloud while the others follow along in the Bible.
This doesn’t seem right to me — and I think that before I started following this “rule” the students connected better with the scriptures.
I get it, that they should be both hearing and reading – some learn better visually, some learn better aurally. But the students reading aloud never deliver the message as effectively as an adult who is familiar with the text delivers it. There is more to delivering meaning than just pronouncing the words.
What is more – this year I have a group of students who don’t seem to WANT to read aloud for the class. None volunteer, I even had one student refuse. If I think the learning process is better served by reading it to them, why fight it?
Code:
What I hear from other teachers is "but they need to learn to read the Bible aloud." Why? The class is about the Faith, not about how to proclaim, a ministry that not everyone is called to. In fact, if they are called to proclaim the Word, then after they are confirmed they are always welcomed to come to the training for Lector ministry -- which is given by me in this parish.
I would be happy to hear some opinions from experienced catechists or professional educators. I also admit that I have seen a couple of articles on education websites that seem to agree with me that having students of this age reading aloud in class is not the most effective way to teach the material.