D
dominikus28
Guest
I was just thinking about war and torture, and I thought of the Knights Templar, where the Grand Master De Maloy was tortured and he eventually confessed to the things he was being accused of even though they were not true.
Then I thought of torture during war in the modern context and considered the situation of a soldier who has sensitive information and knows he will be tortured. Most likely, he will not be able to stay quiet under such extreme torture, so in order to prevent himself from revealing information which the enemy will then use to the detriment of his people/country, would he be justified in committing suicide?
It may sound extreme but consider this. Killing is wrong because it is taking the life of another human, which only God can take away because He gave it. But, killing in self-defense is justified because your intent isnt to take the life away, but only to prevent that person from taking your life, and n order to stop him, you must incapacitate him, by taking his life away. So in this case, your intent is to save yourself, not directly to kill him.
If you apply this to the suicide case, your intent is to save your people by preventing sensitive information from being revealed to the enemy. You know that your will isn’t strong enough to resist extreme torture, so you know that if you are submitted to it, you will reveal those secrets. So your intent is to prevent sensitive information from being revealed to the enemy not directly, to kill yourself. So your motive here is selfless not selfish.
Thoughts?
Then I thought of torture during war in the modern context and considered the situation of a soldier who has sensitive information and knows he will be tortured. Most likely, he will not be able to stay quiet under such extreme torture, so in order to prevent himself from revealing information which the enemy will then use to the detriment of his people/country, would he be justified in committing suicide?
It may sound extreme but consider this. Killing is wrong because it is taking the life of another human, which only God can take away because He gave it. But, killing in self-defense is justified because your intent isnt to take the life away, but only to prevent that person from taking your life, and n order to stop him, you must incapacitate him, by taking his life away. So in this case, your intent is to save yourself, not directly to kill him.
If you apply this to the suicide case, your intent is to save your people by preventing sensitive information from being revealed to the enemy. You know that your will isn’t strong enough to resist extreme torture, so you know that if you are submitted to it, you will reveal those secrets. So your intent is to prevent sensitive information from being revealed to the enemy not directly, to kill yourself. So your motive here is selfless not selfish.
Thoughts?