Summa Theological on Abortion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter A.Pelliccio
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

A.Pelliccio

Guest
Ok I was looking up the theological arguments against abortion. My girlfriend is doing an essay tracing the church’s teaching on abortions, so if any one has a good THEOLOGICAL argument against abortion it would be appreciated.

As for Summa, I pulled out my copy and goggled the topic. A lot of hits came up that St Thomas supported abortion? I can’t believe this to be true, but couldn’t find the part of the Summa to dispute it.

Does anyone have quotes, articles, or a portion of the Summa in which St Thomas outline the evil of abortion? Also if anyone has ANY other theological arguments against abortion, it would be greatly appreciated?

Thanks

Anthony
 
This is because he held to the medieval idea of the quickening of the soul. Basically he believed the children had no souls until so long after conception. It had to do with a lack of biological understanding. He would not have felt that way today.
 
40.png
A.Pelliccio:
Ok I was looking up the theological arguments against abortion. My girlfriend is doing an essay tracing the church’s teaching on abortions, so if any one has a good THEOLOGICAL argument against abortion it would be appreciated.

As for Summa, I pulled out my copy and goggled the topic. A lot of hits came up that St Thomas supported abortion? I can’t believe this to be true, but couldn’t find the part of the Summa to dispute it.

Does anyone have quotes, articles, or a portion of the Summa in which St Thomas outline the evil of abortion? Also if anyone has ANY other theological arguments against abortion, it would be greatly appreciated?

Thanks

Anthony
It is false to say that he believed in abortion, even if he taught the quickening of the soul theory. This theory does not automatically mean that abortion is acceptable.
 
**Catholic Positions on Abortion

**The Didache

“The second commandment of the teaching: You shall not murder. You shall not commit adultery. You shall not seduce boys. You shall not commit fornication. You shall not steal. You shall not practice magic. You shall not use potions. You shall not procure [an] abortion, nor destroy a newborn child” (*Didache *2:1–2 [A.D. 70]).

The Letter of Barnabas

“The way of light, then, is as follows. If anyone desires to travel to the appointed place, he must be zealous in his works. The knowledge, therefore, which is given to us for the purpose of walking in this way, is the following. . . . Thou shalt not slay the child by procuring abortion; nor, again, shalt thou destroy it after it is born” (*Letter of Barnabas *19 [A.D. 74]).

The Apocalypse of Peter

“And near that place I saw another strait place . . . and there sat women. . . . And over against them many children who were born to them out of due time sat crying. And there came forth from them rays of fire and smote the women in the eyes. And these were the accursed who conceived and caused abortion” (*The Apocalypse of Peter *25 [A.D. 137]).

Athenagoras

“What man of sound mind, therefore, will affirm, while such is our character, that we are murderers?
. . . [W]hen we say that those women who use drugs to bring on abortion commit murder, and will have to give an account to God for the abortion, on what principle should we commit murder? For it does not belong to the same person to regard the very fetus in the womb as a created being, and therefore an object of God’s care, and when it has passed into life, to kill it; and not to expose an infant, because those who expose them are chargeable with child-murder, and on the other hand, when it has been reared to destroy it” (*A Plea for the Christians *35 [A.D. 177]).

Tertullian

“In our case, a murder being once for all forbidden, we may not destroy even the fetus in the womb, while as yet the human being derives blood from the other parts of the body for its sustenance. To hinder a birth is merely a speedier man-killing; nor does it matter whether you take away a life that is born, or destroy one that is coming to birth. That is a man which is going to be one; you have the fruit already in its seed” (*Apology *9:8 [A.D. 197]).

"Among surgeons’ tools there is a certain instrument, which is formed with a nicely-adjusted flexible frame for opening the uterus first of all and keeping it open; it is further furnished with an annular blade, by means of which the limbs [of the child] within the womb are dissected with anxious but unfaltering care; its last appendage being a blunted or covered hook, wherewith the entire fetus is extracted by a violent delivery.

"There is also [another instrument in the shape of] a copper needle or spike, by which the actual death is managed in this furtive robbery of life: They give it, from its infanticide function, the name of embruosphaktes, [meaning] “the slayer of the infant,” which of course was alive. . . .

“[The doctors who performed abortions] all knew well enough that a living being had been conceived, and [they] pitied this most luckless infant state, which had first to be put to death, to escape being tortured alive” (*The Soul *25 [A.D. 210]).

“Now we allow that life begins with conception because we contend that the soul also begins from conception; life taking its commencement at the same moment and place that the soul does” (ibid., 27).

“The law of Moses, indeed, punishes with due penalties the man who shall cause abortion [Ex. 21:22–24]” (ibid., 37).

Minucius Felix

“There are some [pagan] women who, by drinking medical preparations, extinguish the source of the future man in their very bowels and thus commit a parricide before they bring forth. And these things assuredly come down from the teaching of your [false] gods. . . . To us [Christians] it is not lawful either to see or hear of homicide” (*Octavius *30 [A.D. 226]).
 
Catholic Positions on Abortion, Continued.

Hippolytus


“Women who were reputed to be believers began to take drugs to render themselves sterile, and to bind themselves tightly so as to expel what was being conceived, since they would not, on account of relatives and excess wealth, want to have a child by a slave or by any insignificant person. See, then, into what great impiety that lawless one has proceeded, by teaching adultery and murder at the same time!” (*Refutation of All Heresies *[A.D. 228]).

Lactantius

"When God forbids us to kill, he not only prohibits us from open violence, which is not even allowed by the public laws, but he warns us against the commission of those things which are esteemed lawful among men. . . . Therefore, let no one imagine that even this is allowed, to strangle newly-born children, which is the greatest impiety; for God breathes into their souls for life, and not for death. But men, that there may be no crime with which they may not pollute their hands, deprive [unborn] souls as yet innocent and simple of the light which they themselves have not given.

“Can anyone, indeed, expect that they would abstain from the blood of others who do not abstain even from their own? But these are, without any controversy, wicked and unjust” (*Divine Institutes *6:20 [A.D. 307]).

Council of Ancyra

“Concerning women who commit fornication, and destroy that which they have conceived, or who are employed in making drugs for abortion, a former decree excluded them until the hour of death, and to this some have assented. Nevertheless, being desirous to use somewhat greater lenity, we have ordained that they fulfill ten years [of penance], according to the prescribed degrees” (canon 21 [A.D. 314]).

Basil the Great

“Let her that procures abortion undergo ten years’ penance, whether the embryo were perfectly formed, or not” (First Canonical Letter, canon 2 [A.D. 374]).

“He that kills another with a sword, or hurls an axe at his own wife and kills her, is guilty of willful murder; not he who throws a stone at a dog, and unintentionally kills a man, or who corrects one with a rod, or scourge, in order to reform him, or who kills a man in his own defense, when he only designed to hurt him. But the man, or woman, is a murderer that gives a philtrum, if the man that takes it dies upon it; so are they who take medicines to procure abortion; and so are they who kill on the highway, and rapparees” (ibid., canon 8).

John Chrysostom

“Wherefore I beseech you, flee fornication. . . . Why sow where the ground makes it its care to destroy the fruit?—where there are many efforts at abortion?—where there is murder before the birth? For even the harlot you do not let continue a mere harlot, but make her a murderess also. You see how drunkenness leads to prostitution, prostitution to adultery, adultery to murder; or rather to a something even worse than murder. For I have no name to give it, since it does not take off the thing born, but prevents its being born. Why then do thou abuse the gift of God, and fight with his laws, and follow after what is a curse as if a blessing, and make the chamber of procreation a chamber for murder, and arm the woman that was given for childbearing unto slaughter? For with a view to drawing more money by being agreeable and an object of longing to her lovers, even this she is not backward to do, so heaping upon thy head a great pile of fire. For even if the daring deed be hers, yet the causing of it is thine” (*Homilies on Romans *24 [A.D. 391]).

Jerome

“I cannot bring myself to speak of the many virgins who daily fall and are lost to the bosom of the Church, their mother. . . . Some go so far as to take potions, that they may insure barrenness, and thus murder human beings almost before their conception. Some, when they find themselves with child through their sin, use drugs to procure abortion, and when, as often happens, they die with their offspring, they enter the lower world laden with the guilt not only of adultery against Christ but also of suicide and child murder” (*Letters *22:13 [A.D. 396]).

The Apostolic Constitutions

“Thou shalt not use magic. Thou shalt not use witchcraft; for he says, ‘You shall not suffer a witch to live’ [Ex. 22:18]. Thou shall not slay thy child by causing abortion, nor kill that which is begotten. . . . *f it be slain, [it] shall be avenged, as being unjustly destroyed” (*Apostolic Constitutions 7:3 [A.D. 400]).
 
Pax vobiscum!

Check out Bob Sungenis’ website and read his essay on Roe v. Wade. He spends part of the time talking about the Church’s historical position and mentions some good sources. I think if you check out those sources you’ll find some great information.

In Christ,
Rand
 
Please correct this, if it’s wrong.

I was told that Aquinas said abortion is not murder, the reason being that it could only be called murder after quickening; prior to that, it’s called abortion.

So if:

prior to quickening = abortion
after quickening = murder

then the only difference between abortion and murder in these cases is the time it occurs; St. Thomas, however, considered both mortal sins.

Is this accurate, or was I misled?
 
40.png
Batjacboy:
Please correct this, if it’s wrong.

I was told that Aquinas said abortion is not murder, the reason being that it could only be called murder after quickening; prior to that, it’s called abortion.

So if:

prior to quickening = abortion
after quickening = murder

then the only difference between abortion and murder in these cases is the time it occurs; St. Thomas, however, considered both mortal sins.

Is this accurate, or was I misled?
Pax vobiscum!

Robert Sungenis addresses this very point in his essay.

Here is the link: catholicintl.com/catholicissues/1973.htm
The section is called ****The Theological and Philosophical Reasons Against Abortion

****In Christ,
Rand
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top