Tattoo of Our Lady

  • Thread starter Thread starter Epistemes
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Tatoos and kinky body piercings are a sign on the times. Think: “…As in the time of Noah…”, that’s Biblical and it means… before civilization.

Consider:

What do all primitave paliolythic tribal gatherers and hunters in the anthropology text book have in common…???

Tatoos and kinky body piercings.
“Hummmm” not all primitive paleolithic tribal gatherers and hunters had tattoos
'Nuther words… the savages in Austrailia had no contact with the savages in South America or in Africa… yet all those savages had certain things in common…
“Aborigines” ( i think that’s what they like to be called instead of savages) in Australia did not have Tattoos. In some tribes there is ritual scaring. I know a few who have these. Really next time you you feel like going off on a racist rant. do a little research (using modern text books… they might even tell you the proper names of races) That way you wont look like such a backward uneducated moron whose sole education doesn’t rely on 1930’s movies and ignorance.
Get it???
Now on to the other rational educated posters on this thread.
Some posters have said that you shouldn’t get tattoos. Because it might imply that we are unhappy with what God gave us. if this is the case. Then technically we shouldn’t cut/dye our hair. people should not get ear rings etc. Of course this is a silly argument but still:shrug: . I got one small tattoo as a young adult before i read in the bible how God said we shouldn’t get tattoos. I know as a christian i should live by the new laws Christ brought forth. but still…I don’t look at anyone who has a religious tattoo as doing anything bad or sinful. as i have seen some really nice (amusingly) meaningful religious tattoos. i think its a personal thing. if you are doing it for the right meaning, then who am i to judge?
 
“Hummmm” not all primitive paleolithic tribal gatherers and hunters had tattoos
Racist…???

No. All of our ancesters were “savages” at one time in anthropolpgical history.

Aborigine ( Sp…? ) means the origional inhabatants of a region. The Scandanavians are probably the aborigional people of the Scandinavian penninsula.
 
Racist…???

No. All of our ancesters were “savages” at one time in anthropolpgical history.
No they weren’t. Many were noble races, with probably more moral ethics than us so called “civialised” peoples.
Aborigine ( Sp…? ) means the origional inhabatants of a region. The Scandanavians are probably the aborigional people of the Scandinavian penninsula.
Yes of course…You only need to read the journals of Capt cook to know that. but…aborigine or aboriginal. was a name that just stuck, with the original inhabitants of Australia…And now world wide (among the educated) the original inhabitants of Australia are known as Aboriginals. Even Aboriginals class themselves as this. They might go further and say they are from a certain tribe or people such as Kamilaroi for example. But all in all. they are known as aboriginal…and not as you claimed savages…
 
I have seen some gorgeous tattoos. I don’t have a problem with it. The other has to do with gang affiliation. Around here, we have problems with Hispanic gangs. Unfortunately, some of them have taken to huge tatts and stickers of O.L. of Guadalupe, to the point where you can’t count upon it as a sign of faith.

Ruthie
Thats true. There is a certain type of Tatoo that connects you to gang life and prison culture. Our lady is one.

I dont know what to say. There is a negative here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top