Teaching at a protestant school

  • Thread starter Thread starter tac
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

tac

Guest
Is it morally justifiable for a Catholic to teach at a protestant school? What has the Church traditionally said?
 
What is considered a protestant school. I have never heard that term used before.:confused:
 
I don’t know if there are any official documents on this, but I went to a Catholic college, and one of my professors (World Civilizations and Political Science courses) was an ordained Protestant minister. The courses he taught had nothing to do with religion. He was one of my favourite professors.
 
What is considered a protestant school. I have never heard that term used before.:confused:
In my neighbourhood, there are Lutheran and Baptist elementary and high schools. There is also a Methodist college. One of my Catholic friends went to the Methodist college. She has a Master’s degree in chemistry.
 
Is it morally justifiable for a Catholic to teach at a protestant school? What has the Church traditionally said?
As long as the Catholic isn’t teaching religion or theology, I don’t see how it would be different from working for any other Protestant employer.

Many protestant schools require that all employees sign a statement of faith that might not be possible for a faithful Catholic to sign. I looked into teaching at a local Protestant college but the application had not only a statement of faith that was Sola Scriptura but also a statement that I wouldn’t drink or smoke on or off the job. I don’t smoke but… 🙂

A Lutheran school that was recruiting recently was pretty strict in hiring only practicing Christians but their Statement of Faith was worded in such a way that I didn’t see any conflict for Catholics.
 
Is it morally justifiable for a Catholic to teach at a protestant school? What has the Church traditionally said?
What is the difference to teaching with adult education where there is not option but to teach not only Protestant but largely agnostic environment.
As long as the Catholic isn’t teaching religion or theology,
I do not see any reason why a Catholic cannot teach religion at a Protestant school.

Our late Parish Priest [a very saintly man who lived by canon law], his housekeeper earned her living as a teacher of religion, she worked in a normal state school. She was held in very high regard by both pupils and staff alike.

She is a nun now. 👍
 
I do not see any reason why a Catholic cannot teach religion at a Protestant school.

Our late Parish Priest [a very saintly man who lived by canon law], his housekeeper earned her living as a teacher of religion, she worked in a normal state school. She was held in very high regard by both pupils and staff alike.

She is a nun now. 👍
I am not exactly sure what a “normal state school” is but if it is the equivalent of a public school in the US that is a different thing althogether. Religion, in public schools (usually universities) is taught with at least a veneer of objectivity and neutrality. Religion in a Protestant school would likely include the teachings of the Reformation as a necessary good, Sola Scriptura as the only true authority etc. I don’t think a Catholic could follow that lesson plan. 🙂
 
Religion, in public schools (usually universities) is taught with at least a veneer of objectivity and neutrality
I don’t know which public schools you are talking about but here in Texas there is no such thing as religion being discussed with at least a veneer of objectivity and neutrality. Muslims here are allowed to pray…Christians are expelled for praying during the lunch hour. Many other things happen as well.
 
Why would a Catholic even consider it? They’d probably be constrained from trying to spread their Catholocism so how could a Catholic in good concience consent to work in that kind of setting?
 
I am not exactly sure what a “normal state school” is but if it is the equivalent of a public school in the US that is a different thing althogether. Religion, in public schools (usually universities) is taught with at least a veneer of objectivity and neutrality. Religion in a Protestant school would likely include the teachings of the Reformation as a necessary good, Sola Scriptura as the only true authority etc.
You might want to contain your speculative fervor and inquire as to what evangelical institutions actually teach. My college, for instance, requires this as its statement of faith:
We believe the Bible to be the inspired, the only infallible, authoritative Word of God. • We believe that there is one God, eternally existent in three persons: Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
• We believe in the deity of our Lord Jesus Christ, in His virgin birth, in His sinless life, in His miracles, in His vicarious and atoning death through His shed blood, in His bodily resurrection, in His ascension to the right hand of the Father, and in His personal return in power and glory.
• We believe that for the salvation of lost and sinful people, regeneration by the Holy Spirit is absolutely essential.
• We believe in the present ministry of the Holy Spirit by whose indwelling the Christian is enabled to live a godly life.
• We believe in the resurrection of both the saved and the lost; they that are saved unto the resurrection of life and they that are lost unto the resurrection of damnation.
• We believe in the spiritual unity of believers in our Lord Jesus Christ.
The only part of this that contradicts Catholicism is the first part, and a Catholic who believed in material sufficiency could conceivably get around this by saying that the Word of God handed down in Sacred Tradition is not different in content from the Word of God that comprises Scripture. So Scripture is the only infallible Word of God, but that same Word is transmitted by other means as well.

The final clause is insufficient from a Catholic point of view, but not false. Catholicism does teach that all who believe in Christ have a certain spiritual unity.

Wheaton professor Joshua Hochschild made the argument that Wheaton’s statement of faith was compatible with Catholicism (though he failed to convince the administration and was fired anyway). However, Wheaton’s statement is more ambiguous than the one quoted above inasmuch as it says that the Bible is “of supreme and final authority” rather than using the fatal word “only.” Wheaton’s ecclesiology is more explicit, though I think you could use Vatican II to make it fit as well.

Edwin
 
Why would a Catholic even consider it? They’d probably be constrained from trying to spread their Catholocism so how could a Catholic in good concience consent to work in that kind of setting?
Because most evangelical institutions (of higher education, that is) are explicitly ecumenical–my own institution’s president likes to talk about being “Christ-centered.” Somebody needs to stand up and make the case that Catholicism is just as Christ-centered as anything.

Given the fatal word “only,” I’m not sure how well this would work at my institution, or whether it would even be honest to attempt it. So far no one has.

Edwin
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top