D
Damascus
Guest
Into something else. Yes.Yes, nirvana is an ‘escape’ from something – and an ‘entrance’ into something else.
Not with something else.
desolate peace.
Into something else. Yes.Yes, nirvana is an ‘escape’ from something – and an ‘entrance’ into something else.
That is not my understanding of Buddhism. On the contrary in fact. Buddhism sees pain as a necessary part of progress.My problem with Buddhism, if I have one is that it sees suffering as something to be avoided, or, better, transcended and I am not at all sure that this is something Christians should want, never mind whether its really even realizable.
I thought heaven was a place/state where suffering was no more?My problem with Buddhism, if I have one is that it sees suffering as something to be avoided, or, better, transcended and I am not at all sure that this is something Christians should want, never mind whether its really even realizable.
Have you visited a Pure Land, or Tibetan Buddhist center? You’ll find lots of ‘grace’ in those places. Some forms of Buddhism focus upon ‘self-power’ (without denying ‘grace’, though), whereas other forms of Buddhism really put the emphasis upon ‘grace’ (or ‘other-power’, as they call it).By transcend I mean simply “transcend”; as in “get beyond”.
Yes, there is no suffering in heaven. But heaven is not something that can be gained by hard work and application of the eightfold path.
It is a gift.
And that is, i guess the real difference.
Buddhism, at its most sublime is still graceless and little more than the exploitation of human potential.