You could ask the same question in respect of the Angels etc,.The only question I would ask is - why didn’t you?I think we are dealing with an anomaly at the Big Bang. In one hand we know that there is no theory which can explain changes in infinity. In another hand we have a change from singularity to regularity which means a theory for corresponding change should exist.
Anomoly - something that deviates from what is standard, normal, or expected.I think we are dealing with an anomaly at the Big Bang. In one hand we know that there is no theory which can explain changes in infinity. In another hand we have a change from singularity to regularity which means a theory for corresponding change should exist.
Angels? I cannot see how they are related to this topic.You could ask the same question in respect of the Angels etc,.The only question I would ask is - why didn’t you?
paduard
A normal situation is when there is a theory for quantifiable variables, such as density, temperature, etc. These variables are infinite at the Big Bang therefore you cannot find a theory for them to find the evolution of the system from initial point. In another hand we know that system evolve from the Big Bang to universe which means that there was a motion in the system which it in principle could be formulated.Anomoly - something that deviates from what is standard, normal, or expected.
“there are a number of anomalies in the present system”
What is the “normal” that the big bang should be compared to?
So, what does this normal situation look like, and how can it be compared to the big bag?A normal situation is when there is a theory for quantifiable variables, such as density, temperature, etc. These variables are infinite at the Big Bang therefore you cannot find a theory for them to find the evolution of the system from initial point. In another hand we know that system evolve from the Big Bang to universe which means that there was a motion in the system which it in principle could be formulated.
So what exactly is anomalous about it?I think we are dealing with an anomaly at the Big Bang. In one hand we know that there is no theory which can explain changes in infinity. In another hand we have a change from singularity to regularity which means a theory for corresponding change should exist.
A normal situation is when there is a theory for quantifiable variables, such as density, temperature, etc. These variables are infinite at the Big Bang.So, what does this normal situation look like, and how can it be compared to the big bag?
To be honest I don’t know what word is suitable. Do you have any suggestion?I contend that the word anomaly has been misused in the title. And any conclusions based on that misuse are invalid.
The problem is about the fact that you cannot have any change in infinity in another hand we have a change in infinity (Big Bang) to regularity (universe). You cannot have a change in infinity because “infinity+any finite number=infinity”.So what exactly is anomalous about it?
Sounds like a model is incorrectly being assumed to be reality.A normal situation is when there is a theory for quantifiable variables, such as density, temperature, etc. These variables are infinite at the Big Bang.
To be honest I don’t know what word is suitable. Do you have any suggestion?
Despite the usefulness of models, they are, by definition, incomplete descriptions of reality. The reality is that the current scientific thinking has concluded that the universe had a beginning.All models are wrong; some models are useful.
For instance in George E. P. Box, William Hunter and Stuart Hunter, Statistics for Experimenters, second edition, 2005, page 440.
I am not defining any model. I am just putting facts together and finding a conflict.Sounds like a model is incorrectly being assumed to be reality.
Despite the usefulness of models, they are, by definition, incomplete descriptions of reality. The reality is that the current scientific thinking has concluded that the universe had a beginning.
The fact that your model does not fit this reality is not a problem with reality, it is a problem with the model.
So your issue is with the act of creation?The problem is about the fact that you cannot have any change in infinity in another hand we have a change in infinity (Big Bang) to regularity (universe). You cannot have a change in infinity because “infinity+any finite number=infinity”.
There was something in Big Bang so I think that is the moment of existence whether created or not.So your issue is with the act of creation?
First you don’t have an anomaly. An anomaly presupposes you have some sort of history or precedence to compare against. You don’t have that.The problem is about the fact that you cannot have any change in infinity in another hand we have a change in infinity (Big Bang) to regularity (universe). You cannot have a change in infinity because “infinity+any finite number=infinity”.
I agree with what you state. Thanks.First you don’t have an anomaly. An anomaly presupposes you have some sort of history or precedence to compare against. You don’t have that.
A singularity is usually assumed for the Big Bang (BB) based upon Einstein’s equations gravity. However, they are inadequate as they don’t consider quantum effects. We don’t know what happens at the singularity at the earliest moments of the universe because we don’t have data nor equations to handle it. As always quoted, all known laws of physics break down at the singularity. I don’t know enough to defend all this, just enough to know that we don’ t have enough information to definitely say what happened at the singularity, especially before the inflation of the universe.
You can’t define what change is if you don’t know what you got in the first place. Infinity is not a cure all for non-knowledge.