The Book of Mormon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jas84173
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Very clever lax16, you present me with a false dichotomy in that the only way I can accept Sullivan’s conclusions about apostolic succession is to accept his conclusions about female ordination.
No, just using his stance on female ordination to prove to you that he does not speak for the Catholic Church and should not be quoted to prove a point.
 
Did Joseph Smith know anything about the early Church outside of the Bible? Only his own words and not present day LDS believers. Tks in advance.

MJ
This is an excellent question and I wish I had an answer, but I don’t. Sorry.
 
“Documentation” seems to be of paramount importance to Mormons for determining who has the priesthood. I do not believe Catholics obsess as much about the same sort of documentation, for reasons given above about Tradition, Magisterium, the unbroken continuance and steady progression of the Church (in followers and encompassed lands), as well as other well-known factors. On the other hand, Mormons don’t seem to mind that there is no documentation regarding the “ordination” of some Old Testament and New Testament prophets (e.g., Silas), and none at all of prophets in “Book of Mormon lands” in the Americas.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top