S
SombreMind
Guest
First, I don’t know if this is the right section for this thread. I excuse myself if that is not the case.
My “problem” is apparently simple. I am a cradle Catholic who became an atheist, the usual trajectory, and came back recently. I’m reading a lot, of every denomination. My struggle is with the Orthodoxy/Catholicism subdivision, the absurdity of it. In the year of the Lord 2020, there exists two Apostolic Churches on Earth who both claims to be the only one real Church and that the other is a den of heretics. Arguments between exponents of said Churches can go on forever, tirelessly, uselessly. Both parties have convincing arguments and too many biases; I am myself more a fan of Eastern mysticism than the legalism of Scholasticism (that too often sadly overshadows our history of mysticism and monasticism - as Thomas Aquinas wasn’t himself a monk in the first place) but it really seems that Jesus gave a special role to Peter and hence, to Rome.
I am writing a lot, please excuse my prolixity. The point is, this contrast is driving me a bit mad in my regained, yet very frail, faith. We know there is only one truth, yet both parties think they are unquestionably right in their assertion of truth. What if I am somehow wrong, and being a Catholic, outside the true Church founded by Christ? No, citing Fathers of the Church solves nothing because they all wrote before the schism! And the stern, excessive severity of Tridentine Church was a (necessary) reaction to the Reformation, an historical reality that can’t be ignored; furthermore, they weren’t concerned with the East in those times, as the poor guys were falling to the Turks and geopolitical irrelevance.
Is the situation of Christians today similar to that of the Israelites in Jesus’ time, being subdivided in Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes, Ellenists etc.? Many sect, one law one Covenant and one God; many interpretations, the same texts and the same Patriarchs. Maybe it doesn’t matter as long as one believe in Christ: after all the Lord himself, when he came, didn’t make distinction between persons on the basis of their presumed knowledge, but judged the hearth of every man. Because otherwise, God left us adrift in a mess, and atheists who scorn at the division of Christianity would be right.
I am not searching for arguments in favor of Catholicism. I know them all at this point. Saints, miracles. The point is in the division itself! It makes our faith less credible. How to accept that we are so divided, yet Jesus spoke of only one Church? With atheism and moral relativism spreading as the default mindset of learned people, a world sliding into instability, confusion of doctrines and malpractices in our Catholic Church itself (to not mentions the many problem Orthodox themselves are facing…).
My “problem” is apparently simple. I am a cradle Catholic who became an atheist, the usual trajectory, and came back recently. I’m reading a lot, of every denomination. My struggle is with the Orthodoxy/Catholicism subdivision, the absurdity of it. In the year of the Lord 2020, there exists two Apostolic Churches on Earth who both claims to be the only one real Church and that the other is a den of heretics. Arguments between exponents of said Churches can go on forever, tirelessly, uselessly. Both parties have convincing arguments and too many biases; I am myself more a fan of Eastern mysticism than the legalism of Scholasticism (that too often sadly overshadows our history of mysticism and monasticism - as Thomas Aquinas wasn’t himself a monk in the first place) but it really seems that Jesus gave a special role to Peter and hence, to Rome.
I am writing a lot, please excuse my prolixity. The point is, this contrast is driving me a bit mad in my regained, yet very frail, faith. We know there is only one truth, yet both parties think they are unquestionably right in their assertion of truth. What if I am somehow wrong, and being a Catholic, outside the true Church founded by Christ? No, citing Fathers of the Church solves nothing because they all wrote before the schism! And the stern, excessive severity of Tridentine Church was a (necessary) reaction to the Reformation, an historical reality that can’t be ignored; furthermore, they weren’t concerned with the East in those times, as the poor guys were falling to the Turks and geopolitical irrelevance.
Is the situation of Christians today similar to that of the Israelites in Jesus’ time, being subdivided in Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes, Ellenists etc.? Many sect, one law one Covenant and one God; many interpretations, the same texts and the same Patriarchs. Maybe it doesn’t matter as long as one believe in Christ: after all the Lord himself, when he came, didn’t make distinction between persons on the basis of their presumed knowledge, but judged the hearth of every man. Because otherwise, God left us adrift in a mess, and atheists who scorn at the division of Christianity would be right.
I am not searching for arguments in favor of Catholicism. I know them all at this point. Saints, miracles. The point is in the division itself! It makes our faith less credible. How to accept that we are so divided, yet Jesus spoke of only one Church? With atheism and moral relativism spreading as the default mindset of learned people, a world sliding into instability, confusion of doctrines and malpractices in our Catholic Church itself (to not mentions the many problem Orthodox themselves are facing…).
Last edited: