M
mercy509
Guest
I have a few questions.
Why does the Catholic Church believe in two more comings of Jesus Christ?
Jesus told St. Faustina to write this:
“Before I come as the Just Judge, I am coming first as the King of Mercy.” (Pg. 42 of the diary)
If that is NOT in alignment with Church teaching, then most certainly the Catholic Church could not have deemed her to be a saint, could they?
Are not all saints of the Church thoroughly examined before the Church will deem them to be saints? Therefore what St. Faustina is saying cannot be heresy as the Catholic Church would indeed know heresy when they see it, is that not the case?
So question.
Where is the King of Mercy found in Holy Scripture; and more specifically, where is He found in the Book of Revelation?
Clearly Revelation 19 is the Just Judge. But where does Jesus come before that as the King of Mercy?
Is Matthew 24:29 pointing to the Just Judge or to the King of Mercy? Is it possible that we have been thinking all along that it points to the Just Judge, but rather it points to another place in the Book of Revelation as the King of Mercy?
Now clearly, if Jesus Himself indicates in the Gospels that the signs of His return will be the sun, moon, stars, sign in the sky, the people mourning, Him gathering His elect and then the lesson of the fig tree, then where do all of those line up in the Book of Revelation?
Revelation 6, Seal 6?
We Catholics can most certainly see that Jesus cannot lie or misdirect people, so when He gives us the signs of His return, then why do we assume those are pointing to Revelation 19 when Revelation 19 does not contain those signs but rather Revelation 6 does?
Clearly Jesus speaks simply and straightforward and means every word He says, does He not? So if that is the case, then have we completely ignored what He has told us are the clear signs of His return? If they are not in the Book of Revelation, then so be it. However if those signs are grouped together in the Book of Revelation and we have overlooked them, then that is on us, is it not?
Lastly, if Jesus tells us that He is sneaking up on this world like a thief in the night, then clearly that will indeed take place as Jesus cannot lie. Therefore, is it the Just Judge that is the one sneaking up on this world like a thief in the night…
… or rather is it the King of Mercy?
The below video shows a timeline of the Book of Revelation. It appears that we have had it wrong and that St. Faustina had it correct that there are two more comings of Jesus Christ as there is no other way to explain this:
“Before I come as the Just Judge, I am coming first as the King of Mercy.”
God bless.
youtu.be/yrI2VjnwuLc?t=13m12s
Why does the Catholic Church believe in two more comings of Jesus Christ?
Jesus told St. Faustina to write this:
“Before I come as the Just Judge, I am coming first as the King of Mercy.” (Pg. 42 of the diary)
If that is NOT in alignment with Church teaching, then most certainly the Catholic Church could not have deemed her to be a saint, could they?
Are not all saints of the Church thoroughly examined before the Church will deem them to be saints? Therefore what St. Faustina is saying cannot be heresy as the Catholic Church would indeed know heresy when they see it, is that not the case?
So question.
Where is the King of Mercy found in Holy Scripture; and more specifically, where is He found in the Book of Revelation?
Clearly Revelation 19 is the Just Judge. But where does Jesus come before that as the King of Mercy?
Is Matthew 24:29 pointing to the Just Judge or to the King of Mercy? Is it possible that we have been thinking all along that it points to the Just Judge, but rather it points to another place in the Book of Revelation as the King of Mercy?
Now clearly, if Jesus Himself indicates in the Gospels that the signs of His return will be the sun, moon, stars, sign in the sky, the people mourning, Him gathering His elect and then the lesson of the fig tree, then where do all of those line up in the Book of Revelation?
Revelation 6, Seal 6?
We Catholics can most certainly see that Jesus cannot lie or misdirect people, so when He gives us the signs of His return, then why do we assume those are pointing to Revelation 19 when Revelation 19 does not contain those signs but rather Revelation 6 does?
Clearly Jesus speaks simply and straightforward and means every word He says, does He not? So if that is the case, then have we completely ignored what He has told us are the clear signs of His return? If they are not in the Book of Revelation, then so be it. However if those signs are grouped together in the Book of Revelation and we have overlooked them, then that is on us, is it not?
Lastly, if Jesus tells us that He is sneaking up on this world like a thief in the night, then clearly that will indeed take place as Jesus cannot lie. Therefore, is it the Just Judge that is the one sneaking up on this world like a thief in the night…
… or rather is it the King of Mercy?
The below video shows a timeline of the Book of Revelation. It appears that we have had it wrong and that St. Faustina had it correct that there are two more comings of Jesus Christ as there is no other way to explain this:
“Before I come as the Just Judge, I am coming first as the King of Mercy.”
God bless.
youtu.be/yrI2VjnwuLc?t=13m12s