C
Cat
Guest
Although I respect these series, I would argue that they do NOT fulfil the criteria that I listed. Perhaps you were referring to another post than mine?
First of all, these are fantasy, not popular novels. I personally don’t like fantasy literature very much, other than fairy tales. Many (not all) women and men share my tastes. We want to read novels about people–human beings, not elves, dwarves, hobbits, and other mythological beings. And we want to read novels with non-fantasy plots. The Left Behind novels are about modern-day people facing the unthinkable–being left behind. There is a lot of mystery and intrigue in the novels. But no dragons and no swordfights. That’s fantasy. Not all fiction is fantasy.
Both Tolkien and Lewis wrote their fantasy series at a reading level much higher than middle school. Also, the fact that both gentlemen were English means that their works include vocabulary, etc. that is unfamiliar to American readers. When I was growing up in the 70s, the English teachers considered the LOTR series appropriate college-level reading. Considering the decline in reading comprehension among American people, I would say that, sadly, we are probably even less likely to comprehend and appreciate Tolkien now than 40 years ago! The “Left Behind” series is written at a level that is comprehensible to a 6th grader.
To a certain extent, Lewis and Tolkien include romance in their novels. But again, this is not romance like most of us experience romance. We’re talking fantasy here! Star Trek, Dark Shadow, Snow White! We’re not talking about a human man and a human woman meeting and falling in love during a series of events.
Now please don’t think I’m criticizing Tolkien or Lewis. I think these are great pieces of fine literature, and for many, they are beach reads. But there are many more who would not consider LOTR or Narnia a “beach read.”
And that’s what I’m talking about–I’m talking about “beach reads.” That’s what Left Behind is–a beach read, something you bring to the airport to keep you entertained while sitting out a delay or a bump. It’s not by any stretch of the imagination “fine literature.”
I think Catholics are looking for “beach reads,” and not finding them. I’m guessing that there is resistance to Catholic publishing houses publishing “low-brow” literature instead of fine literature. And I think that’s wrong–I see nothing wrong with “beach reads,” good well-written novels with a Catholic/Christian worldview. Not all Christian reading has to be “fine literature.”
The Protestants have learned over the last 30 years that lots and lots of Christians want to read “beach reads.” There are entire sections of Protestant books stores devoted to “beach read” novels! Yes, there are Protestant fantasy novels, also, but there are many many novels like this: “Steve, an escapee from a fanatical fundamentalist family and now a rising young executive in a fast-paced software company, meets Elaine, a lovely divorced secretary who is struggling to recover from an abusive marriage and hold onto her fragile faith. Will Steve and Elaine be able, with the help of God, to work through the issues that both keep them apart and draw them together?”
There are no elves in Steve’s and Elaine’s world, just as there are no elves (at least that we can see) in our worlds. That’s why many of us prefer to read about Steve and Elaine rather than Aragorn and Arwen. Sorry!
I say that Catholics need to play catch-up here and make like the Protestants when it comes to fiction! Right now, Catholics make up a huge portion of the purchasers of the “Steve and Elaine” novels! So Catholic publishers aren’t accomplishing anything by refusing “beach reads” other than losing the money that Catholic readers are spending in PROTESTANT bookstores! Catholic publishers should look for some good Catholic novelists and jump on the bandwagon! I don’t they should be afraid that Catholics won’t read the novels–obviously Catholics ARE reading “Christian” novels as evidenced by the ca-ching in the Protestant bookstores!
First of all, these are fantasy, not popular novels. I personally don’t like fantasy literature very much, other than fairy tales. Many (not all) women and men share my tastes. We want to read novels about people–human beings, not elves, dwarves, hobbits, and other mythological beings. And we want to read novels with non-fantasy plots. The Left Behind novels are about modern-day people facing the unthinkable–being left behind. There is a lot of mystery and intrigue in the novels. But no dragons and no swordfights. That’s fantasy. Not all fiction is fantasy.
Both Tolkien and Lewis wrote their fantasy series at a reading level much higher than middle school. Also, the fact that both gentlemen were English means that their works include vocabulary, etc. that is unfamiliar to American readers. When I was growing up in the 70s, the English teachers considered the LOTR series appropriate college-level reading. Considering the decline in reading comprehension among American people, I would say that, sadly, we are probably even less likely to comprehend and appreciate Tolkien now than 40 years ago! The “Left Behind” series is written at a level that is comprehensible to a 6th grader.
To a certain extent, Lewis and Tolkien include romance in their novels. But again, this is not romance like most of us experience romance. We’re talking fantasy here! Star Trek, Dark Shadow, Snow White! We’re not talking about a human man and a human woman meeting and falling in love during a series of events.
Now please don’t think I’m criticizing Tolkien or Lewis. I think these are great pieces of fine literature, and for many, they are beach reads. But there are many more who would not consider LOTR or Narnia a “beach read.”
And that’s what I’m talking about–I’m talking about “beach reads.” That’s what Left Behind is–a beach read, something you bring to the airport to keep you entertained while sitting out a delay or a bump. It’s not by any stretch of the imagination “fine literature.”
I think Catholics are looking for “beach reads,” and not finding them. I’m guessing that there is resistance to Catholic publishing houses publishing “low-brow” literature instead of fine literature. And I think that’s wrong–I see nothing wrong with “beach reads,” good well-written novels with a Catholic/Christian worldview. Not all Christian reading has to be “fine literature.”
The Protestants have learned over the last 30 years that lots and lots of Christians want to read “beach reads.” There are entire sections of Protestant books stores devoted to “beach read” novels! Yes, there are Protestant fantasy novels, also, but there are many many novels like this: “Steve, an escapee from a fanatical fundamentalist family and now a rising young executive in a fast-paced software company, meets Elaine, a lovely divorced secretary who is struggling to recover from an abusive marriage and hold onto her fragile faith. Will Steve and Elaine be able, with the help of God, to work through the issues that both keep them apart and draw them together?”
There are no elves in Steve’s and Elaine’s world, just as there are no elves (at least that we can see) in our worlds. That’s why many of us prefer to read about Steve and Elaine rather than Aragorn and Arwen. Sorry!
I say that Catholics need to play catch-up here and make like the Protestants when it comes to fiction! Right now, Catholics make up a huge portion of the purchasers of the “Steve and Elaine” novels! So Catholic publishers aren’t accomplishing anything by refusing “beach reads” other than losing the money that Catholic readers are spending in PROTESTANT bookstores! Catholic publishers should look for some good Catholic novelists and jump on the bandwagon! I don’t they should be afraid that Catholics won’t read the novels–obviously Catholics ARE reading “Christian” novels as evidenced by the ca-ching in the Protestant bookstores!