The Morning-After Pill and Pharmacist

  • Thread starter Thread starter kathleenmm
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you ever wonder what a pharmacist salary is? What they make in one hour or as their annual income? The following page will give you a concise overview of information regarding a pharmacist salary, including: job prospects, work environment, factors affecting pharmacist salary, typical work schedule, hourly pharmacist salary, annual pharmacist salary, highest paying cities, highest paying states, and highest paying work environment.
 
Cùng thegioisex.wen.ru t?o nên nh?ng cú hÃch tinh th?n cho toÃn th? các b?n nhé. Chuyên truyen sex hay nh?t Vi?t Nam v?i nh?ng câu truyen loan luan 2013 d?nh cao c?a ngh? thu?t
 
For anyone who does not know, “emergency contraception” works in many ways, and one of the ways is that it prevents implantation (eventually resulting in the death of the unborn). So yeah, it does cause abortion sometimes. Also, the normal birth control pill itself sometimes works this way too.

The reason that this is not called an “abortifacient” (in medical terminology) is because of the way that the medical community / abortion lobby has redefined the terms.
Abortion is often defined by pro-lifers as the “intentional killing of the unborn”, but by pro-choicers as the “termination of a pregnancy”.
Contrary to common sense, the medical community has redefined “pregnancy” so that it does not begin until implantation. This is about a week after conception. Any death to the unborn during that time does not end the “pregnancy” (which hasn’t yet started, by their defintion), so the abortion industry can get away with saying, “Since the woman is not pregnant, these drugs do not cause abortions.” Either way, it doesn’t change the fact that emergency contraception sometimes ends the unborn’s life.
Given that emergency contraception is licit in certain situations, I would argue that unless the pharmacist knows for certain that the patient has ovulated, he should assume she has not, and dispense the medicine as prescribed. (And there’s no way for him to know for certain unless he breaks numerous HIPAA laws to obtain that information.)
I disagree. That assumption, if wrong, could cost someone his life.
The only safe thing to do is to test the woman and hope the test is accurate. If she cannot be tested, then err on the side of caution and do not dispense the emergency contraception.
 
This thread has been dormant for a considerable period. With rare exceptions, reviving threads after a protracted period of inactivity is discouraged because:
Code:
the issues that spurred them are often no longer "hot" or current topics, explaining why thread activity ceased originally.
posters originally involved in the discussion are sometimes no longer active on the forum and, therefore, unavailable to reply to comments added to the thread.
Our experience suggests that, when a topic merits revival, it is best accomplished by initiating a new thread that draws on recent events and can be posted to contemporaneously. This eliminates the baggage of folks being frustrated by asking and not receiving responses to issues raised in early posts (because the new poster didn’t notice that the post he was responding to was made a long time ago).

Posters are very welcome to open a new thread on the subject or any other topic, as well as to actively participate in the myriad active threads in the fora.

Thank you to all those who have participated in this discussion. This thread is now closed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top