The Nature of Eternity

  • Thread starter Thread starter RCconvert7
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
not so odd as you might think. I thought this way too for a while. If I understand you correctly, it would be much like a drop of water entering the ocean. However, I think that catholic teaching takes issue with this. Apperently, we retain our individual selves while at the same time being perfectly united with god. Don’t ask me how!
You do maintain your individual being. But at the same time, your mind and life would be united to His.

I imagine this as receiving life directly from Him through our breathing or skin (as opposed to the unstable biological process we have now), and looking into His mind, in the same way that He looks into ours.

ICXC NIKA
 
It may sound like an odd way of looking at the nature of our entering into eternity, but I view it as our being eaten by God and becoming perfectly assimilated by Him.
Interestingly enough, that is precisely how Blessed Jan Van Ruusbroec, the greatest of the Dutch mystics and proponent the Rhineland school, describes the unio mystica (the union of the individual human soul with the Godhead):

“…To eat for ever and be for ever eaten, to rise and to descend unceasingly; such is our eternity. To eat and be eaten! this is Union!..since His desire is without measure, to be devoured of Him does not greatly amaze…”

***- Blessed John Ruysbroeck (1293 – 1381), Flemish Catholic mystic ***

Evelyn Underhill who commented on this passage from Ruusbroec also explain why people might find it completely odd:
“…The self they declare is devoured, immersed in the abyss…In their efforts towards describing this, the supreme mystic act, and the new life to which it gives birth, they are often driven to the use of images which must seem to us grotesque, were it not for the flame which burns behind…”
***- Evelyn Underhill, 1911, Mysticism ***
 
I would like to discuss the nature of eternity. God is eternal. By this, we mean (I think) that God is beyond and outside the confines of linear time.
Eternity ( Catholic Encyclopedia )
By saying that God is eternal we mean that in essence, life, and action He is altogether beyond temporal limits and relations. He has neither beginning, nor end, nor duration by way of sequence or succession of moments. There is no past or future for God — but only an eternal present. If we say that He was or that He acted, or that He will be or will act, we mean in strictness that He is or that He acts; and this truth is well expressed by Christ when He says (John 8:58 — A.V.): “Before Abraham was, I am.” Eternity, therefore, as predicated of God, does not mean indefinite duration in time — a meaning in which the term is sometimes used in other connections — but it means the total exclusion of the finiteness which time implies. We are obliged to use negative language in describing it, but in itself eternity is a positive perfection, and as such may be best defined in the words of Boethius as being “interminabilis vitae tota simul et perfecta possessio,” i.e. possession in full entirety and perfection of life without beginning, end, or succession.

Immortality ( Catholic Encyclopedia )
By immortality is ordinarily understood the doctrine that the human soul will survive death, continuing in the possession of an endless conscious existence. Together with the question of the existence of God, it forms the most momentous issue with which philosophy has to deal. It belongs primarily to rational or metaphysical psychology and the philosophy of religion, though it comes also into contact with other branches of philosophy and some of the natural sciences.

👍
 
This is turning into an awesome discussion, in the actual meaning of the term, not the worn-out, “that’s an awesome t-shirt” kind of meaning.

The question was asked: Can we “step up” into eternity, and if so, is it possible to “step down” back into linear time? I’d say so. My own mystical experiences would point to yes. The writings of the saints would point to yes. I cannot speak from a point of utmost certanty on this, as it is only a speculation, but I feel like we are given windows into God’s mind, into God’s experience, God’s sight. It’s like being a fish, swimming in the water (the water being linear time), and then coming up for air, and seeing all of time laid out for you, on the surface of the water. But you’re a fish, and eventually you have to go back down and catch your breath.

There is, however, that implication, that if one has the ability to enter eternity, that one would, by the very definition of the condition, understand that one had always been there, in some way. Who am I to know, though. I’m just a guy who has been blessed by God with little moments of bliss. I’m not going to pretend I’ve got answers to the big questions, I just love talking about them!

It was mentioned this idea of “touring heaven.” I firmly believe this old adage should be rejected. "A guy goes to heaven, and St. Peter takes him on a tour of the rooms… " goes the old joke. That’s so inaccurate a picture of Heaven as to be as useful as believing that looking at a photograph of a grape is just as good as consuming the Precious Blood. True, Our Lord did say “in my Father’s house, there are many rooms.” But this should be taken to mean that there is “space for all” or perhaps, as someone speculated, that for God, linear time is like an artist looking at the panels of a comic book, and perhaps these are the “rooms” of which our lord spoke. Perhaps this analogy is better than imagined. Perhaps, from the perspective of eternity, linear time actually is a series of consecutive still frames.

In the Paradiso, Dante (whom I sincerely believe to be a true mystic), illustrated the state of being in heaven as the holy souls being a flower, where each soul is a petal (or each petal is a throne for one soul). The Hosts of Heaven are like the rays of the sun, carrying down the sun’s warmth to the flower. God is the sun, which projects His warmth, and offers it without ceasing to the flower.

I LOVE that image of being consumed by God. The very act of the chewing could be seen as the state of purgatory.

I’m uncomfortable with the idea of two judgments, as it implies change"ness" in a changeless state. Much more easily contemplated for me, is the idea that at the moment of death, if we are ready, we are dropped down at the moment of the FInal judgement… Perhaps the entering of eternity IS the judgement of which we speak. Therfore, even if there is, technically, two judgements, they happen at the same moment, the “last” moment, as it were, before entering timelessness. This implies that such questions are ones of perception rather than actuality. My own readings on Hell seem to point to the idea that WE choose Hell rather than God choosing it for us, or condemning us TO it. Perhaps the difference between the person in Hell and the person in Purgatory is simply a change of orientation. The evil that is in us cannot exist in the presence of God. If, when we die, we are exposed to that presence of pure good, and it is like being in a spaceship, tumbling towards the sun. There is pain and burning, and we have the choice of being liberated from the evil, turning on our engines and pressing forward at greater speeds. This is Purgatory. If, however, we reject God and turn on our retro rockets and attempt to escape the gravity of the burning ball of pure Goodness, we will perpetually be tortured by that burning flame behind us.

This, it seems, goes against what I was saying that death takes us immediately into timelessness… But perhaps it is that our last moments of experiencing time are shmeared out over a percieved period, while that which is inside of us and is unworthy of being in God’s presence is purged from our souls. Who knows. I guess that still doesn’t work well in the context of my experience of the mystic state, but that’s why they call these The Mysteries, I guess.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top