The New Rite of Exorcism

  • Thread starter Thread starter DominvsVobiscvm
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hmmm… the man makes sense. Yet he charges the catechism with error and accuses the Holy See of promulgating a highly defective document. What makes him not a schismatic whereas, say, Sungenis, who holds a minority interpretation of canon law but defends the catechism from charges of error, is?
 
Deciding the Church is in error, puts you outside the Church, no matter what “side” you are on. There is only the Church.
 
Father X is quite right in most of his complaints. Imperative should be the standard ( and ONLY norm ) while performing an Exorcism. Evil Spirit scoffs at watered down, weak kneed “authority”. Any Exorcist worth his salt would desire the " full armor of God " ( His Authority ) before, during, and after an exorcism. For more info on an exorcism, try reading " Hostage To The Devil " by Fr. Malachi Martin.
 
Hmmm… the man makes sense. Yet he charges the catechism with error and accuses the Holy See of promulgating a highly defective document. What makes him not a schismatic whereas, say, Sungenis, who holds a minority interpretation of canon law but defends the catechism from charges of error, is?
Click to expand...
I wouldn’t call *Latin Mass * magazine or Robert Sungenis schismatic per se, but only inclining in that direction.

That having been said, I don’t agree with everything this article says. Regarding the Catechism, I guess we’d have to admit that it’s wording is defective; I’d hesitate to say its in outright error.

The new edition of the *Roman Ritual * is clearly in error, on a number of points, as Father Amorth, Rome’s Chief Exorcist himself, has admitted on many on occasion. The fact that he was able to secure permission to use the old Ritual is proof, at least for me, that the Holy Spirit is watching over His Church.
 
The Dead Bishop:
Father X is quite right in most of his complaints. Imperative should be the standard ( and ONLY norm ) while performing an Exorcism. Evil Spirit scoffs at watered down, weak kneed “authority”. Any Exorcist worth his salt would desire the " full armor of God " ( His Authority ) before, during, and after an exorcism. For more info on an exorcism, try reading " Hostage To The Devil " by Fr. Malachi Martin.
Click to expand...
Martin was openly schismatic, and there’s no way that his tenture as an exorcism, or and even the ones he claimed to have performed, can be verified.

For a more accurate account, by someone who is much more mainstream, I’d check out Father Amorth’s books, published by Ignatius Press.
 
40.png
DominvsVobiscvm:
Martin was openly schismatic, and there’s no way that his tenture as an exorcism, or and even the ones he claimed to have performed, can be verified.

For a more accurate account, by someone who is much more mainstream, I’d check out Father Amorth’s books, published by Ignatius Press.
Click to expand...
Openly schismatic, sir??? How so? Where’s your “proof”? Claimed to have performed?? Angels would fear to “tread” where you are going, sir.
 
Some people even say that Fr.Martin was a pectore[secret[ Cardinal.
 
My understanding was that the new rite left out some language that was in the old. It isn’t invalid. Just not quite as direct. I want to see an official new translation. Then if I can have a possessed volunteer I will try out an exorcism with the new rite and see if it works.
 
40.png
cmom:
Deciding the Church is in error, puts you outside the Church, no matter what “side” you are on. There is only the Church.
Click to expand...
He didn’t say the Church was in error on faith and morals. He said the new rite of exorcism was an error, and makes a compelling case for it. While something may be valid and (in some cases) obligatory, that doesn’t necessarily make it ideal. It seems that abandoning the imperative may not only be less than ideal but extremely risky.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top