The only proof that Catholicism needs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zynxensar
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Z

Zynxensar

Guest
Proving the resurrection happened should be enough to prove that Jesus is God, isn’t it? There’s historical evidence to support it too.
 
  1. Catholicism doesn’t “need” “proof”
  2. It’s my understanding that the only historical events in Jesus’ life on which historians generally agree are that Jesus existed, that he was baptized by John the Baptist, and that between 1 and 3 years later he was crucified by order of Pontius Pilate. Therefore, the historicity of the Resurrection is disputed.
 
Last edited:
Except you cannot scientifically prove that the resurrection happened. You can only prove that Christians believed in the resurrection from the beginning. And that’s good enough for me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top