A
aisb23
Guest
I’m going to preface this by stating upfront that I am Jewish and therefore have no personal religious stake in the claims of Dan Brown. However I am also a historian by training and I detest bad historical research, which “The DaVinci Code” most certainly is an example of.
Perhaps you saw ads for this program “The Real DaVinci Code” last week hyping its broadcast on Saturday night. And the ads looked like it was all supportive of Dan Brown’s nonsense.
Well it’s not! It completely debunks, point by point, every aspect of “The DaVinci Code” and it’s source material “Holy Blood, Holy Grail”.
I’d actually been aware of this program for sometime and was dying to see it. It’s a British import hosted by Tony Robinson. For those of you into BritComs, he played Baldrick in the various Blackadder series, but he’s also produced and hosted several other excellent historical documentaries. And this one is of particularly high quality.
The basic scheme of the show works something like this, Robinson details one of the allegations in the book and then let’s various talking heads (along the lines of Michael Baigent and Elaine Pagels) natter on about how it may be right. Robinson then travels about the world looking for possible explanations and then they bring in respectable historians, art experts and journalists to completely rip the books to shreds. Showing how all Dan Brown’s and Messrs Baigent, Lincoln & Leigh’s claims just don’t hold up to historical fact.
Tony Robinson successfully manages to take fiction and hold it up to the light of fact. And he does it with a stylish sense of humor.
I think the best thing about this documentary is actually the fact that it does not use theology to make it’s point. The debunkers are largely secular writers and the facts cited are all publically available to the public if they are willing to do some research. This way DC fans can’t go around saying “Oh that’s just the Catholic Church point of view”.
I have one niggling complaint and that is that they used the Garden Tomb rather than the Holy Sepuchre when discussing the events of the ressurection. Perhaps they couldn’t get permission to film at the Sepulchre, but the claim that the Garden Tomb is the burial place just doesn’t hold up to archaeology and history. This is rather minor to my point of view.
On the whole I heartily recomment “The Real DaVinci Code” and if Discovery Channel repeats I think you should watch it.
–arthur
Perhaps you saw ads for this program “The Real DaVinci Code” last week hyping its broadcast on Saturday night. And the ads looked like it was all supportive of Dan Brown’s nonsense.
Well it’s not! It completely debunks, point by point, every aspect of “The DaVinci Code” and it’s source material “Holy Blood, Holy Grail”.
I’d actually been aware of this program for sometime and was dying to see it. It’s a British import hosted by Tony Robinson. For those of you into BritComs, he played Baldrick in the various Blackadder series, but he’s also produced and hosted several other excellent historical documentaries. And this one is of particularly high quality.
The basic scheme of the show works something like this, Robinson details one of the allegations in the book and then let’s various talking heads (along the lines of Michael Baigent and Elaine Pagels) natter on about how it may be right. Robinson then travels about the world looking for possible explanations and then they bring in respectable historians, art experts and journalists to completely rip the books to shreds. Showing how all Dan Brown’s and Messrs Baigent, Lincoln & Leigh’s claims just don’t hold up to historical fact.
Tony Robinson successfully manages to take fiction and hold it up to the light of fact. And he does it with a stylish sense of humor.
I think the best thing about this documentary is actually the fact that it does not use theology to make it’s point. The debunkers are largely secular writers and the facts cited are all publically available to the public if they are willing to do some research. This way DC fans can’t go around saying “Oh that’s just the Catholic Church point of view”.
I have one niggling complaint and that is that they used the Garden Tomb rather than the Holy Sepuchre when discussing the events of the ressurection. Perhaps they couldn’t get permission to film at the Sepulchre, but the claim that the Garden Tomb is the burial place just doesn’t hold up to archaeology and history. This is rather minor to my point of view.
On the whole I heartily recomment “The Real DaVinci Code” and if Discovery Channel repeats I think you should watch it.
–arthur