N
Neofight
Guest
neofight:
so unless the bishop determines otherwise, OR an individual is exempted for one of the stated reasons, kneeling is required for everyone else. I didn’t say anything about it being “absolutely” required, nor is what allegra said based on her own interpretation. neither one of us claimed anything was non-negotiable. you are the one adding these restrictive words. the girm lists exceptions, which means those who do not meet those exceptions are bound by the rule.
you might want to look up the definition of the word “should.” yes, it can mean something is merely suggested, but it’s also the past conditional tense of “shall,” which means something must happen, given something else. ambiguous, perhaps, but there it is.
/QUOTE]
I’ll make a deal with you…I’ll look up "should "and “shall”, and you consider doing a better job of qualifying your claims, by researching the difference between implied and explicit statements, because “kneeling is required for everyone else” implies that there are no exclusions .
Perhaps if I sharpen my linguistics skills as you suggest, and if you are more precise in you syntax, we wouldn’t be having similar discussions in the future.
Peace and all good!