G
Greg_McPherran
Guest
What is the role of Scripture in Catholicism? I think when we first learn about Scripture we seem to think that it’s some kind of rule book or definitive answer on everything and that every word is directly from the mouth of God with no human interplay.
However, it seems to me that the Church recognized and canonized certain Scriptures because of their leadership and usefulness. Also do some actually carry more weight than others and the Church would know this? For example, would Romans carry more weight than Jude or do the Gospels carry more weight than Paul’s letters?
Even the Gospels have different stories about certain events and I think some of these are mutually exclusive.
Also, for example, Paul says I think that I too have the Spirit of God (or something like that). How can that be inspired if he says I think I have the Spirit? I think another place(s) Paul says he is only giving his opinion as a man. Isn’t he making it clear in such cases that he is not speaking under inspiration?
So, it would seem that Scripture is profitable but is not some neat, tidy, package organized as if God wrote it and left it on the ground for humans to find.
Do people catch the heart of what I am saying? I think this is where Protestants get hung up because they don’t see that Scripture is the book of the Church for the Church’s purpose.
What am I missing?
Greg
However, it seems to me that the Church recognized and canonized certain Scriptures because of their leadership and usefulness. Also do some actually carry more weight than others and the Church would know this? For example, would Romans carry more weight than Jude or do the Gospels carry more weight than Paul’s letters?
Even the Gospels have different stories about certain events and I think some of these are mutually exclusive.
Also, for example, Paul says I think that I too have the Spirit of God (or something like that). How can that be inspired if he says I think I have the Spirit? I think another place(s) Paul says he is only giving his opinion as a man. Isn’t he making it clear in such cases that he is not speaking under inspiration?
So, it would seem that Scripture is profitable but is not some neat, tidy, package organized as if God wrote it and left it on the ground for humans to find.
Do people catch the heart of what I am saying? I think this is where Protestants get hung up because they don’t see that Scripture is the book of the Church for the Church’s purpose.
What am I missing?
Greg