The Ultimate Communion-in-the-Hand "what do the documents really say?" thread!!

[ethelzguy]

Hey, I didn’t start this…

But, let’s not make Ms. Anthony get her ruler out. My knuckles are too old to get whacked

 

[ncjohn]

Ok, so back on topic…“what do the documents really say?”

They say Yup, both are ok.
Even in Texas.

 

[RobGentner]

Ok, so back on topic…“what do the documents really say?”

They say Yup, both are ok.
Even in Texas.

Yup! That be what they say, partner! or as they would say here is San Antonio Si Senor!

Does anyone think that it is more reverent for someone to stick the host on your tongue than in your cupped hands?

 

[Lepanto]

Ok, so back on topic…“what do the documents really say?”

They say Yup, both are ok.

Thank you for helping to put the thread back on topic–but the fact that both methods are allowed (in some countries) really is not the topic, either.

A quick reading of the citations in the first three posts shows a clear preference by the Church for COTT over CITH. That is what the documents say and that is the topic of this thread.

Again, if anyone can demonstrate to the contrary that the Church does not have a preference, please provide the citations and let’s have a civil discussion. Forty-three posts into this thread, and nobody has shown any contrary evidence.

 

[pnewton]

A quick reading of the citations in the first three posts shows a clear preference by the Church for COTT over CITH.

I asked earlier and didn’t get an answer. Which one uses “preference.”

 

[RobGentner]

I asked earlier and didn’t get an answer. Which one uses “preference.”

OK I will ask …what differeence does it make? “whats his name” said that in his opinion: “A quick reading of the citations in the first three posts shows a clear preference by the Church for COTT over CITH.” [Edited] he said they shows a clear preference in his opinion of COTT over CITH!
:extrahappy: I actually laughed so hard typing this post my sides hurt:extrahappy:

[Edited]

Bless everyone!