C
ChibiViolet
Guest
Does anyone really understand Theology of the Body, in these particular aspects:
“God gave us sexual desire ‘in the beginning,’ according to John Paul, to be the very power to love in the image of God through the sincere gift of self. This is why he calls the sexual urge “a vector of aspiration along which [our] whole existence develops and perfects itself from within” (Love & Responsibility p. 46). According to Christian revelation, there are two ways of fulfilling this fundamental call to love: marriage or celibacy (see Familiaris Consortio n. 11).”
“Of course, due to sin, the sexual urge doesn’t simply well up in us as the desire to make the sincere gift of self. Everyone single, married, or consecrated celibate must contend with the manifold disorders and confusions of lust. But what hope we have when we realize, as John Paul stresses, that the heart is deeper than lust, and Christ “reactivate that deeper heritage and give it real power in man’s life” (TB, Oct 29, 1980).”
It seems to me that no one gets it. I can never get a good answer as to how this applies to real life for an actual unmarried person. I mean, how does one go about embracing their sexual feelings without sinning? If someone says it’s all lust–all sinful or improper than wouldn’t that make this theology completely false–that the hormones are just here to test us if our vocation isn’t marriage and we should strive to become asexual? Is it wrong to let ourselves feel sexual at all (if we can at all help it) and if so than why are we sexual beings at all? I spend so much time wishing I could be asexual or a non-sexual being because I wish to avoid all sins of impurity and yet if sexuality is itself tainted beyond redemption in this life, than such should be outright acknowledged by the Church so the confusion can end.
I mean this isn’t all I think about, but without a real answer, how can the confusion end prior to death?
“God gave us sexual desire ‘in the beginning,’ according to John Paul, to be the very power to love in the image of God through the sincere gift of self. This is why he calls the sexual urge “a vector of aspiration along which [our] whole existence develops and perfects itself from within” (Love & Responsibility p. 46). According to Christian revelation, there are two ways of fulfilling this fundamental call to love: marriage or celibacy (see Familiaris Consortio n. 11).”
“Of course, due to sin, the sexual urge doesn’t simply well up in us as the desire to make the sincere gift of self. Everyone single, married, or consecrated celibate must contend with the manifold disorders and confusions of lust. But what hope we have when we realize, as John Paul stresses, that the heart is deeper than lust, and Christ “reactivate
It seems to me that no one gets it. I can never get a good answer as to how this applies to real life for an actual unmarried person. I mean, how does one go about embracing their sexual feelings without sinning? If someone says it’s all lust–all sinful or improper than wouldn’t that make this theology completely false–that the hormones are just here to test us if our vocation isn’t marriage and we should strive to become asexual? Is it wrong to let ourselves feel sexual at all (if we can at all help it) and if so than why are we sexual beings at all? I spend so much time wishing I could be asexual or a non-sexual being because I wish to avoid all sins of impurity and yet if sexuality is itself tainted beyond redemption in this life, than such should be outright acknowledged by the Church so the confusion can end.
I mean this isn’t all I think about, but without a real answer, how can the confusion end prior to death?