It doesn’t seem like pantheism to me. In fact, it seems consistent with the way the Bible describes creation.
We are taught by Moses,
And God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he them; male and female created he them. – Genesis 1:27
In describing the creation of man in God’s own image, the verse explicitly says, “male and female.” So the act of creation performed by man mirrors the act of creation performed by God, with three causes, not one, as described here:
And the earth was formless and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. – Genesis 1:2-3
So just like in the act of creation performed by man, there is the egg (the waters, the void), the sperm (the Spirit), and the act of fertilization (the Spirit fecundating the waters, and calling forth the light).
As Moses describes, the Earth and the Spirit are both there, present, in the beginning, but the Earth is in a formless state. It is nothingness, emptiness, void. It is the act of fecundation by the Spirit that causes this nothingness to
manifest into what we would consider form.
This also mirrors the human act of creation. The sperm and the egg contain all of the forms of the future human being, but in a
potential , unmanifested state, which we refer to as DNA. These archetypes appear to be “nothing,” but they
manifest and become forms (a person) through the act of fertilization. But they were there, present, in a formless state, in the beginning.
Moses does
not say the earth wasn’t there; he says it was formless and void. That is, the earth
appeared to be “nothing” (or at least, what we would perceive or understand to be nothing), but in reality it was merely formless, unmanifested archetypes brought into a state of manifestation by an act of the Spirit.
