Thoughts on AI?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maximilian75
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Here’s an article about how AI will destroy humanity:


And here’s the same article run through Google Translate a few times:

Elon Musk thinks it’s probably a lot of artificial intelligence (A) that can endanger people.

The founder of Tesla and finally only a handful of large companies use AI systems and energy levels “superfluous”.

In his opinion, 1,000 "Red has little chance of being safe for these people and systems.

Elon Musk, two years ago, drove the NKT car,
“It may have a ten percent chance of winning five results,” Neuralink Rolling Stone officials said after filing a document at the Foreign Office.

He also said Google had invested in DeepMind to focus on AI.

Red Deer Marcus said he was working on AI to prevent society from creating something without security awareness.

“Two Facebook, Amazon and Google, and probably Apple, but it’s up to privacy - you get more information than you remember,” says Rolling Stone.

“It’s a very dangerous concentration of aggression.” If AGI [has high intelligence] it means the greatest strength to solve most errors

However, it does not pose a threat to the generation of these races, which is the greatest threat to BI and human civilization.

“I think I have to deal with the most advanced artificial intelligence many times.”

"

I’m not very worried.
 
Increased technological progress will likely contribute tot he increased hedonism of our society, but I don’t give any credence to doomsday scenarios.
 
You know at 61 I’m starting to develop blurry vision/cataracts. At first glance I thought you had put “thoughts on AL?”

And lo and behold, that actually fits the questions you pose. . . But I won’t go there!

As for artificial intelligence. . . well I grew up on Asimov, Clarke, Heinlein et. al. We could wind up reaping the heavens or reaping the pits of hell. It depends on what we humans do with ‘natural intelligence’ and for the course of the human history we do know, with the exception of a few periods where it seemed to be working well’, it mostly doesn’t seem to last.
 
Short answer: yes, yes, no, maybe.

AI can be a wonderful tool. Human nature being what it is, the design of, implementation of and use of AI can be abused. Thus, it likely will be abused.

Caution… AI can mean many things to many people. In some ways, it’s already here. In many ways it will never come to fruition.

We’re likely to have AI “doctors” that are better in their diagnoses than many human doctors. Self driving cars are a type of AI. likely these will be fully functional in another 10 or so years.

Will they lead to a better society? Who knows? Depends on how well we accept Christ in our lives, and allow the technology to better us rather than corrupt us.
 
Well, it’s already shrunk our attention span, limited our perception of reality, stunted our ability to communicate, partially destroyed writing ability and literacy, and is progressively dumbing us down. But I suppose it could get worse.
 
But humans are limited in strength, so I would dispute your ‘God and rock’ parallel…
 
There is no known mechanism by which matter becomes aware of itself.

So, the machines will do what they’re made to do and probably not much more.
 
Part of the “threat” of AI is augmentation of the human, already possessing a soul. Enhanced memory, speed, intelligence, power etc. That’s the abuse that can harm.

As (name removed by moderator) points out, God Is in charge, but there could be many many trials, or few. Or it could be used for good only.

Then, there’s that pesky free will.
 
Last edited:
There is no AI, there never can be AI, that is just promises from people who want funding for their research and their own livelihood to do something they love doing. Receptors do not produce intelligence. All we can hope to produce is pets and slaves.
 
“Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind.” – Frank Herbert

D
 
Isaac Asimov may have been of the first persons to have benefited fro artificial intelligence, especially in his robot novels. But the only real intelligence in those novels was that of Asimov himself, who was not a robot, despite what critics may say. (Or was Asimov really a secret creation from Susan Calvin’s lab?)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top