S
Dubious. Pater Patriae is used to describe the Roman Emperor. To make it even more unlikely, he would not have tolerated anyone else co-opting that name, apart from the fact that the image you have provided is that of a coin depicting the head of Caesar Augustus, who was crowned even before Jesus was born, let alone consecrated the Bishop of Rome. Furthermore, abbreviations weren’t as popular in the past as they are now.‘Pope’ or ‘Papa’ is the shorterned form of Pater** Pa**triae
we also get ‘Patriarch’ from this
The name appears on this coin
http://www.romanemperors.com/images/augustus/augustus-denarius.jpg
It makes it More Likely, since the Emperor was the Highiest of All priests in the Roman Empire as the Pontifax Maximus, and Pontifax is where we get Pontiff, which is directly applied to the Pope, and after the death of Julius Caesar, the Roman Senate transformed him, into an Imperial God, and mutated with Mitra, from which we get Mithras, and the Vatican was Originally, the Mithraeum, and the Head Priest, coincedently was titled “Pater Patriae”, Mithras was born from a “Rock” aka “Petro/Peter” and upon this “Rock” (The Mithraeum), i shall built my Church aka The Vatican.Dubious. Pater Patriae is used to describe the Roman Emperor. To make it even more unlikely, he would not have tolerated anyone else co-opting that name, apart from the fact that the image you have provided is that of a coin depicting the head of Caesar Augustus, who was crowned even before Jesus was born, let alone consecrated the Bishop of Rome. Furthermore, abbreviations weren’t as popular in the past as they are now.
There is also a far simpler explanation: calling somebody ‘father’ (in Greek páppas and in Latin papa) since antiquity has been used to address somebody of social and/or spiritual authority.
Again, highly unlikely. While the Pope is indeed the Pontifex Maximus, it does not necessarily mean that all titles that were held by the Roman Emperor transfer to the Pope. Both coexisted in ancient history, and not once in historical record has the Bishop of Rome ever been referred to as ‘Pater Patriae’, and even so, they are not as linguistically lazy as you think that they would abbreviate it as ‘Papa’. I’ve also given you a far simpler and probable basis for its etymology instead of your unsubstantiated conjectures, but you have conveniently neglected it.It makes it More Likely, since the Emperor was the Highiest of All priests in the Roman Empire as the Pontifax Maximus, and Pontifax is where we get Pontiff, which is directly applied to the Pope, and after the death of Julius Caesar, the Roman Senate transformed him, into an Imperial God, and mutated with Mitra, from which we get Mithras, and the Vatican was Originally, the Mithraeum, and the Head Priest, coincedently was titled “Pater Patriae”, Mithras was born from a “Rock” aka “Petro/Peter” and upon this “Rock” (The Mithraeum), i shall built my Church aka The Vatican.
Pope Justus of Alexandria was an Alias of Justinus Martyr, A Son of Titus Josephus whom makes minor appearences in the Book of Acts and Colossians, his Grandson was Emperor Marcus Aurelius [Pater Patria], he is also the Brother of St John/Peter, titles like “Pope/Pater Patria” are passed to family member to Family member.Again, highly unlikely. While the Pope is indeed the Pontifex Maximus, it does not necessarily mean that all titles that were held by the Roman Emperor transfer to the Pope. Both coexisted in ancient history, and not once in historical record has the Bishop of Rome ever been referred to as ‘Pater Patriae’, and even so, they are not as linguistically lazy as you think that they would abbreviate it as ‘Papa’. I’ve also given you a far simpler and probable basis for its etymology instead of your unsubstantiated conjectures, but you have conveniently neglected it.
Let it be known to you that the Patriach of Antioch is also called the Pope. Do you argue that the Pope of Alexandria is also somehow the ‘Pater Patriae’? Or is it by far more likely simply an honorific to address a spiritual leader of great importance?
And lastly, you’re incoherent. I can hardly identify your line of reasoning.
Of course it was only an alias! Because Pope Justus died in 129 while Justin Martyr died in 165. The same year, isn’t it?Pope Justus of Alexandria was an Alias of Justinus Martyr, A Son of Titus Josephus whom makes minor appearences in the Book of Acts and Colossians, his Grandson was Emperor Marcus Aurelius [Pater Patria], he is also the Brother of St John/Peter, titles like “Pope/Pater Patria” are passed to family member to Family member.
Although this is taking things off topic, do you have any evidence for this?Pope Justus of Alexandria was an Alias of Justinus Martyr, A Son of Titus Josephus whom makes minor appearences in the Book of Acts and Colossians, his Grandson was Emperor Marcus Aurelius [Pater Patria], he is also the Brother of St John/Peter, titles like “Pope/Pater Patria” are passed to family member to Family member.
Death of Pope Alexandria is Correct, not that of JustinusAlthough this is taking things off topic, do you have any evidence for this?
As since Pope Justus of Alexandria is believed to have died round A.D 129 and Justin Martyr round A.D 165, that is highly unlikely. Or did Justin Martyr become patriarch of Alexandria at 15?