S
STT
Guest
That is not a good reason. By the way, why the spirit of truth has never came to tell people the truth?I have faith in a loving God. This provides me certainty.
That is not a good reason. By the way, why the spirit of truth has never came to tell people the truth?I have faith in a loving God. This provides me certainty.
Why is this not a good reason? Why do you reject it?That is not a good reason.
He did, and does. He speaks through the Magisterium of the Catholic Church.By the way, why the spirit of truth has never came to tell people the truth?
Because Satan can simply intervene such that we will never recognize.Why is this not a good reason? Why do you reject it?
That is a huge claim. Do you mean that the members of the Catholic Church are prophets?He did, and does. He speaks through the Magisterium of the Catholic Church.
I don’t believe Satan is unrecognizable. So this does not explain why it (prior post) was not a good reason.Because Satan can simply intervene such that we will never recognize.
Yes. Each of use is anointed priest, prophet and king at our Baptism.That is a huge claim. Do you mean that the members of the Catholic Church are prophets?
The belief is not enough. Have you ever encounter with Him? I had. He could simply cheat us blind, control our minds, read our minds in advance!I don’t believe Satan is unrecognizable. So this does not explain why it (prior post) was not a good reason.
So they speak to God!?Yes. Each of use is anointed priest, prophet and king at our Baptism.
Priest: To worship God
Prophet: To speak the Truth
King: To rule our lives with self-mastery
You recognized him, proving my point. The rest is pure speculation, without evidence.The belief is not enough. Have you ever encounter with Him? I had. He could simply cheat us blind, control our minds, read our minds in advance!
Yes, It’s called prayer.So they speak to God!?
Her act is subject to God’s act. In fact, it is a participation in God’s act. God knows her act because she is His act. God is not metaphysically subject to creation.What I said is that God’s knowledge in regard to creation is subjected to creation. How? Think of a person who decide in a specific time. God has to sustain her existence so He should know her act. In this sense God’s knowledge is subject to creation (act of the person).
I recognized Him when He wanted.You recognized him, proving my point. The rest is pure speculation, without evidence.
Does God talk with them too?Yes, It’s called prayer.
We are talking about the fact that God’s knowledge is subject to her decision. I agree with what you said but I am saying different thing.Her act is subject to God’s act. In fact, it is a participation in God’s act. God knows her act because she is His act.
Yes it is when it comes to knowledge of decision of individual. God cannot create a creation where the decision of individual is subjected to God’s knowledge otherwise decision lose its meaning and we are individual dealing with our fate.God is not metaphysically subject to creation.
Seems your are extremely confused about who God is an how He relates to us.We are talking about the fact that God’s knowledge is subject to her decision. I agree with what you said but I am saying different thing.
Yes it is when it comes to knowledge of decision of individual. God cannot create a creation where the decision of individual is subjected to God’s knowledge otherwise decision lose its meaning and we are individual dealing with our fate.
No, I am pretty aware of what I am saying. I am not confused. By the way what is wrong with my argument.Seems your are extremely confused about who God is an how He relates to us.
Creation has nothing to do with knowledge. Creation came from God who without him would not be creation nor knowledge. All things come from God. With that said creation could NOT exist without God.Here we are discussing a problem related to eternal God. We know that God has knowledge of everything. This knowledge is unique when it comes to creation. Creation however could exist or not. This means that the knowledge of creation could exist or not. This means that God knows and doesn’t know at the same time which is a contradiction.
I am sorry but I don’t understand how what you said is related to this thread.Creation has nothing to do with knowledge. Creation came from God who without him would not be creation nor knowledge. All things come from God. With that said creation could NOT exist without God.
You may be aware of what you are saying, but this does not make it make sense. You have no argument, only baseless assertions and faulty premises.No, I am pretty aware of what I am saying. I am not confused. By the way what is wrong with my argument.
Huh?You may be aware of what you are saying, but this does not make it make sense. You have no argument, only baseless assertions and faulty premises.
Exactly.Huh?
We know creation exists by the word of God. Not that Creation could exist or the knowledge of creation could exists. God created the world in 7 days. God created Man, Woman, animals, trees all of creation. For goodness sakes God created knowledge itself or it would not exist.Here we are discussing a problem related to eternal God. We know that God has knowledge of everything. This knowledge is unique when it comes to creation. Creation however could exist or not. This means that the knowledge of creation could exist or not. This means that God knows and doesn’t know at the same time which is a contradiction.