Tradtional Source: Learning the LOTH

  • Thread starter Thread starter FrCorey
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I found a wonderful ebook for learning the liturgy of the hours, from lay person to clergy.
How to Say the Breviary, confraternitybooks.com/
It also deals with the older (I’m guessing) pre-1956 rubrics, judging by the description.

Though one wonders what he would have said to the proposals of St. Pius X
 
I believe this site is connected with breviary.net I use the site often because, as a seminarian who has not yet been constituted “in divinis,” I am not bound to say the breviary. I, however, do try and say it daily, and I like the use the pre-1955 version.
 
Seminarian Matt:

Maybe you can answer this question for me. In Summorum Pontificum, the Holy Father speaks of clerics who were ordained “in sacris constitutis.” What does this mean? These are allowed to say the older form of the breviary.
 
I believe this site is connected with breviary.net I use the site often because, as a seminarian who has not yet been constituted “in divinis,” I am not bound to say the breviary. I, however, do try and say it daily, and I like the use the pre-1955 version.
Out of curiosity, is then any particular reason why you prefer the pre-55 to the 1961?
 
In Summorum Pontificum, the Holy Father speaks of clerics who were ordained “in sacris constitutis.” What does this mean? These are allowed to say the older form of the breviary.
Clerics “in sacris constitutis” are those in “major orders”, i.e. Bishop, Priest, Deacon, as distinguished from those clerics “in minoribus ordinibus” (i.e. Acolyte, lector, sub-Deacon, etc.).
Out of curiosity, is then any particular reason why you prefer the pre-55 to the 1961?
Maybe it’s because it’s even less reformed than the '61? I have an English translation and it is a real slog to say, but when I am able to pray the Office that way, the “clock stops” more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top