Trinitarian Mystery Explained Common Folk Way

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bon_Croix
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

Bon_Croix

Guest
A Father is a Father, Son, and Husband.

By husband, I mean bonded in a relationship with a covenant,

A Father and Son have a relationship but aren’t necessarily bonded via a covenant.
 
That doesn’t work. Part of the Trinitarian system claims the Father is not the Son or the Holy Spirit, and the Son and Holy Spirit are not each other. In your analogy the Father, Son, and Husband are all the same person.
 
And the Holy Spirit?

The Father is not the Son and the Son is not the Father.

There is a great little diagram on CAF somewhere that explains this.
 
The FIRST love relationships are found in our Triune God
God, the FIRST family of matchless unity
The Holy Spirit is the family Spirit
 
A Father is a Father, Son, and Husband.

By husband, I mean bonded in a relationship with a covenant,

A Father and Son have a relationship but aren’t necessarily bonded via a covenant.
It may help some, and that’s great, but the analogy if taken literally is the heresy of modalism. It’s not Trinitarian.
 
Last edited:
The best way I have heard it described (in my opinion) is by Tertullian who uses the legal terminology of his day. In legal terminology you have only two things, persons and property. In his language he called them personae and substancia. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are three distinct persons (personae), who jointly and equally share the same property (substance). That substance is divinity itself. Each person is equally divine, although in the economy of the trinity (how the trinity is expressed in the carrying out of the plan of redemption) each person fulfills a different, but overlapping role with the other persons of the Trinity.

Picture the Trinity as like a business owned and operated by three equal share owners. One of the owners might run the day to day operations. Another might run the sales portion of the business. And still another might handle logistics or some other facet of the business. All metaphors break down, but I figure this captures both the distinctness of the persons as well as the unity they share.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top