S
Stylteralmaldo
Guest
I was wondering what many of you thought about this history of the Catholic Church…
Someone else posted this review of it:
amywelborn.com/reviews/triumph.html
I’m particularly interested in your thoughts on the reviewers comments on Martin Luther:
Amy Welborn's Review:
Someone else posted this review of it:
amywelborn.com/reviews/triumph.html
I’m particularly interested in your thoughts on the reviewers comments on Martin Luther:
Amy Welborn's Review:
…The only problem is that Crocker applies this commitment to historical context very selectively. A good example is in his treatment of the Protestant Reformation. Crocker does readers a great service by revealing details about Martin Luther that were ignored and suppressed by their high school and college textbooks, details ranging from Luther’s fixation with certain bodily functions to his willing incitement of violence. But one comes away from this section, with Luther drowned in a flood of ink and the Church, its every Medieval excess and corruption explained and “put in context, spotless and smelling like a rose, believing that the only reason the Reformation occurred was because Martin Luther was a raging lunatic who happened to get a sympathetic noble ear. That is, I’m sorry to say, simply not the case, and Crocker’s account of the Protestant Reformation and events like it is weakened by his broader purpose and selective application of “context”, not strengthened.