Trust Me, Baby. Bush White House snookers Clinton on morning-after pill

  • Thread starter Thread starter David_Paul
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

David_Paul

Guest
Village Voice
by Kristen Lombardi
September 12th, 2005

Just two months ago, George Bush’s administration offered Hillary Clinton a deal. If the New York junior senator quit blocking the president’s nominee to head the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, she’d get something in return—a decision on over-the-counter sales of the morning-after pill. The status of the drug, a booster dose of the common birth control pill approved by an FDA advisory panel and the staff itself, has been under consideration for nearly two years.

The senator got all the necessary assurances. Health and Human Services secretary Michael Leavitt promised in a July 13 letter that the FDA, under his oversight, “will act on this application by September 1.” And Senator Michael Enzi, the Republican chair of the committee handling the nomination, on which Clinton sits, pledged to hold a hearing if the promise wasn’t kept. And so Clinton, along with her colleague Patty Murray of Washington, got out of the way. Five days later, the Senate confirmed the new FDA commissioner, Lester Crawford.

Then came August 26, when Crawford announced his agency was taking “action” on the morning-after pill, or Plan B. The FDA did not do what Clinton had anticipated—that is, unveil a ruling on whether to make Plan B available without a prescription. Instead, it indefinitely postponed any ruling. While Crawford admitted that Plan B is safe, he said the age restrictions on teenage girls’ access to it—age restrictions the agency had requested to begin with—have raised legal issues that need examining in a process that could take months, or longer.

Continued here:

villagevoice.com/news/0537,lombardi,67735,6.html

👍

{moderator’s note. Edited article. Please keep article quotes short (1-3 paragraphs in length)}
 
:clapping:

*“Clearly,” she adds, “the FDA is pandering to very vocal, extreme right-wing groups.” *

Here’s some left - wing lies for ya:

*“If the pro-lifers are really pro-life, they should be pro–Plan B,” Stone says. “But they are hypocrites for setting up a situation that will result in more abortion, not less.” *

How can that possibly be a pro-life stance? Technically… it WOULD be abortion. More twisting from the left… shame on them!
 
40.png
Jeffrey:
More twisting from the left… shame on them!
That is their downfall. They get so twisted up in their twisting they can’t think straight. They cannot reconcile what they say today from a standard they held us to one year or one month ago. And that is among the leadership. Their followers get so balled up, all they can do is defend anything their leaders say–knowing full well they defending the indefensible. Liberalism has been reduced to a snaring opposition to everything.

Whenever I get down and think we aren’t making progress, I read material from inside the opposition. They are chewing each other’s tails off over the situation.
 
40.png
David_Paul:
… The status of the drug, a booster dose of the common birth control pill …
Not hardly. Its over 100 times the dosage of the “common birth control pill” which requires a prescription.
40.png
David_Paul:
…whether to make Plan B available without a prescription. Instead, it indefinitely postponed any ruling. While Crawford admitted that Plan B is safe…
Read the warning label of the “common birth control pill”. Even that’s not safe. Blood clots and strokes are an absolute reality when you start pumping the system full of hormones. Plan B used without medical oversight, its abortifacient component aside for the moment, would be an absolute disaster.

But hey, let’s not let the facts get in the way of a good argument.
 
I’m confused. I thought Senator Clinton was now pro-life. Surely during all of those speeches about how Democrats need to move away from abortion-on-demand, she wasn’t lying merely to garner votes.

– Mark L. Chance.
 
40.png
mlchance:
I’m confused. I thought Senator Clinton was now pro-life. Surely during all of those speeches about how Democrats need to move away from abortion-on-demand, she wasn’t lying merely to garner votes.

– Mark L. Chance.
No, not her! Never!
 
40.png
mlchance:
I’m confused. I thought Senator Clinton was now pro-life. Surely during all of those speeches about how Democrats need to move away from abortion-on-demand, she wasn’t lying merely to garner votes.

– Mark L. Chance.
Oh, no. Not pro-life. Totally pro-contraception. But she doesn’t see this as a problem. She is pro-getting-the-pro-lifers-to-join-us. Catholics historically are a Democratic stronghold. With the hispanic population on a steady incline, both sides are really pandering for the minority and Catholic vote. The Republicans have the support of many Catholics because of their pro-life stance, and the Democrats want to bring us back around. So they say they are welcoming of those who are pro-life (meaning surgical abortion), while not intending to actually DO anything about it.
 
Why does NY Senator Hillary Clinton promote a pill that enables promiscuous sex?

Clinton’s husband followed the same diabolical strain when he refused to promote chastity and caused a huge burden on taxpayers who had to fund the medical bills of who contracted diseaes subsequent to following
the Clinton sexual freedom dictats.
 
40.png
Lizzie:
Why does NY Senator Hillary Clinton promote a pill that enables promiscuous sex?

Clinton’s husband followed the same diabolical strain when he refused to promote chastity and caused a huge burden on taxpayers who had to fund the medical bills of who contracted diseaes subsequent to following
the Clinton sexual freedom dictats.
Because promiscious sex without responsibility makes women equal to men. That’s the entire feminist mantra in a nutshell. Anyone who doesn’t toe that line is excoriated by the left.
 
Do you think Hillary support contraception and abortion because she relies on it to keep her husband from having to support out-of-wedlock children?
😃
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top