A
arey051012
Guest
Suppose you are given a choice between believing an unhappy truth or believing a happy untruth (which you believe to be true). In general, which would you normally choose?
But given that the untruth makes you happy, would you still want the contradictory evidence?If I believe a happy untruth is really true then, of course, I would choose that one. Guess If I believed it to be true then someone would have to show me proof positive that I’m wrong.
In both of these scenarios, the happy untruth eventually becomes unhappy. Suppose that this weren’t the case, and that the happy untruth actually keeps you happy for the rest of your life. Will you then still choose the unhappy truth?Two scenarios came to mind when I read your poll.
My opinion, I’ll go for the unhappy truth every time.
- A person has a strange growth on some part of the body, he could choose to believe it’s just a big ugly wart (happy untruth) even though he knows it might not be, or he could go to the doctor and find out what it really is and discover it is a dangerous form of skin cancer (unhappy truth). The result is he dies from the happy untruth when he could have survived if he had accepted the unhappy truth.
- A person has cancer and is being treated for it. The doctor knows that the odds of survival are 95% against, but he doesn’t tell the the patient because he feels a positive attitude is important. So the patient is left with optimism (happy untruth) instead of knowing that death is at the doorstep (unhappy truth) and the opportunity to prepare his affairs, his family and his soul for death.
I could be really wrong here, but I don’t believe that a happy untruth will ever **keep **you happy. It will always come out and it will always have consequences. The underlying reason for this is the source. Fruit will never fall far from the tree, bad tree gets bad fruit. The source of all untruth whether happy or unhappy is the devil, AKA the Father of All Lies. The source of truth whether happy or unhappy is Jesus, AKA the Way, the Truth, and the Life.In both of these scenarios, the happy untruth eventually becomes unhappy. Suppose that this weren’t the case, and that the happy untruth actually keeps you happy for the rest of your life. Will you then still choose the unhappy truth?
The purpose of life isn’t to get through it in blissful naivete. The purpose of life is to be good, to become a saint. That goal is made more and more possible the better you understand God. If God is Truth, then you need to know the truth to know God, and knowing untruth makes you know God falsely. Hence, even if the truth is unhappy, it is counter to the purpose of life to prefer untruth to it.In both of these scenarios, the happy untruth eventually becomes unhappy. Suppose that this weren’t the case, and that the happy untruth actually keeps you happy for the rest of your life. Will you then still choose the unhappy truth?
Okay, here are a couple of examples.Another way to phrase this question is:
If someone came to you and told you, “One of the things you believe makes you happy, but it is wrong, and I can give you evidence against it which, if you believe it, will make you unhappy.” Would you want to know?
I understood what you were asking the first time. I’m not going to give you a different answer just because you rephrased. So yes, I would like to know.Another way to phrase this question is:
If someone came to you and told you, “One of the things you believe makes you happy, but it is wrong, and I can give you evidence against it which, if you believe it, will make you unhappy.” Would you want to know?
Sorry, my post wasn’t directed at you. I was trying to make the question less abstract.I understood what you were asking the first time. I’m not going to give you a different answer just because you rephrased. So yes, I would like to know.
Ok, fair enough. Sorry for snapping at you.Sorry, my post wasn’t directed at you. I was trying to make the question less abstract.
No, this is still not quite right, because wouldn’t it be better for the 8-year old to know the truth so that they can understand life’s ways better?This is an interesting question. This has been very one-sided so far. All the examples given so far have the untruth coming back to bite you in the behind, but I have a better example:
You are 8 years old. Your family pet dies, but you don’t know about it yet. Your parents tell you some cover story about the pet going to live with someone else, or some such thing to spare you the emotional distress.
Did they do the right thing, or should they have told you the painful truth? You have nothing to gain by knowing your pet’s true fate, it can only hurt you.
You are 8 years old. Your family pet dies, but you don’t know about it yet. Your parents tell you some cover story about the pet going to live with someone else, or some such thing to spare you the emotional distress.
Not so. If your parents keep ‘sparing you emotional distress’ you don’t learn how to cope with it. Sooner or later, something is going to come along that they CAN’T spare you from, and it is going to have a more devastating effect than if you learned, even at an early age, that sometimes bad things can happen.Did they do the right thing, or should they have told you the painful truth? You have nothing to gain by knowing your pet’s true fate, it can only hurt you.