or can I make an inteligent and charitable response defending my faith.
Take turning the other cheek in context . . .
A couple foyers ago, our priest gave a homily on this.
In the first century culture Jesus lived in, after being stricken in that manner, the aggressor’s body would be turned.
If the aggressor
were to slap the proffered cheek, from that posture he would have to do so with his
left hand, shaming himself in so doing . . .
(I think the modern clinical term, then, would be “passive aggressive”


[and, no, I don’t know why backhanding the victim wouldn’t be an option . . .)
Similarly for the cloak–the shame for nudity was on the person who caused it, not the nude person. Surrendering the last of the clothing would shame the taker. (and in the context given, the outer garnet was presumably collateral for a loan, which the lender would be religiously obligated to return at nightfall)
hawk