C
Catholic_Kenpo
Guest
Before I get on to my question, make sure you’ve seen the episode that aired on 11/9 (Shadowboxing) unless you don’t mind spoilers. If you read past this, it’s not my fault if the episode is spoiled for you
.
.
.
.
.
.
So I was watching the latest episode of Heroes the other night, and the battle between Parkman and Sylar really got me to wondering. I think we could all agree that Sylar is an unrepentant murderer and deserves whatever fate come his way. Matt was in a difficult position, however. He could acquiesce to Sylar’s demands and allow Sylar to regain his body, thereby releasing him to kill more people or he could trick someone into killing him, basically committing suicide, but eliminating Sylar at the same time. Matt had already proven that he didn’t have the ability to truly contain Sylar within his mind, so that really wasn’t an option for him. I thought it was an interesting twist for Matt to basically allow himself to be killed in order to make sure that Sylar never kills again, but it occurred to me that I didn’t know the theological repurcussions of that decision.
Was Matt justified in allowing himself to be killed in this situation? Would it have been better to let Sylar regain his body and hope that he can be contained at that point? Or is there another option that Matt should have gone for?
I don’t know that I have an answer; I just found it to be a very interesting question. Discuss.
-CK
EDIT: I should add that I don’t actually believe that Matt/Sylar are actually dead (Sylar is THE villain of the series, and as such can’t really die), but that’s irrelevant to the discussion at hand. For the purposes of the thread, we’re just going to assume that they both died here.
.
.
.
.
.
So I was watching the latest episode of Heroes the other night, and the battle between Parkman and Sylar really got me to wondering. I think we could all agree that Sylar is an unrepentant murderer and deserves whatever fate come his way. Matt was in a difficult position, however. He could acquiesce to Sylar’s demands and allow Sylar to regain his body, thereby releasing him to kill more people or he could trick someone into killing him, basically committing suicide, but eliminating Sylar at the same time. Matt had already proven that he didn’t have the ability to truly contain Sylar within his mind, so that really wasn’t an option for him. I thought it was an interesting twist for Matt to basically allow himself to be killed in order to make sure that Sylar never kills again, but it occurred to me that I didn’t know the theological repurcussions of that decision.
Was Matt justified in allowing himself to be killed in this situation? Would it have been better to let Sylar regain his body and hope that he can be contained at that point? Or is there another option that Matt should have gone for?
I don’t know that I have an answer; I just found it to be a very interesting question. Discuss.
-CK
EDIT: I should add that I don’t actually believe that Matt/Sylar are actually dead (Sylar is THE villain of the series, and as such can’t really die), but that’s irrelevant to the discussion at hand. For the purposes of the thread, we’re just going to assume that they both died here.