Type 1 diabetis breakthrough using adult stem cells

  • Thread starter Thread starter yinekka
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Y

yinekka

Guest
Diabetics cured in [adult] stem-cell treatment
David Rose
Bold and material in square brackets mine.

Diabetics using [adult] stem-cell therapy have been able to stop taking insulin injections for the first time, after their bodies started to produce the hormone naturally again.

In a breakthrough trial, 15 young patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes were given drugs to suppress their immune systems followed by **transfusions of stem cells drawn from their own blood. **
The results show that insulin-dependent diabetics can be freed from reliance on needles by an injection of their own stem cells. The therapy could signal a revolution in the treatment of the condition, which affects more than 300,000 Britons.

People with type 1 diabetes have to give themselves regular injections to control blood-sugar levels, as their ability to create the hormone naturally is destroyed by an immune disorder. …

All but two of the volunteers in the trial, details of which are published today in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), do not need daily insulin injections up to three years after stopping their treatment regimes.

The findings were released to reporters yesterday as the future of US stem-cell research was being debated in Washington.

Stem cells are immature, unprogrammed cells that have the ability to grow into different kinds of tissue and can be sourced from people of all ages…

The JAMA study provides the first clinical evidence for the efficacy of [adult] stem cells in type 1 diabetes. Sufferers of the chronic condition, which normally emerges in childhood or early adulthood, have to inject themselves at least four times a day.

The new study, by a joint team of Brazilian and American scientists, found that one of the first patients to undergo the procedure has not used any supplemental synthetic insulin for three years. “Very encouraging results were obtained in a small number of patients with early-onset disease,” …

Type 1 diabetes occurs when the body’s own immune system malfunctions and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells of the pancreas, causing a shortage in the hormone…

By the time most patients receive a clinical diagnosis, 60 to 80 per cent of their beta cells have been wiped out. The disease progresses from this point very quickly, and can result in serious long-term complications including blindness, kidney failure, heart disease and stroke.

Dr Voltarelli’s team hoped that if they intervened early enough they could wipe out and then rebuild the body’s immune system by using ** the patients’adult] stem cells**, preverving a reservoir of beta cells and allowing them to to regenerate.

They enrolled Brazilian diabetics aged between 14 and 31 who had been diagnosed within the previous six weeks. After stem cells had been harvested from their blood, they then underwent a mild form of chemotherapy to eliminate the white blood cells causing damage to the pancreas. They were then given **transfusions of their own stem cells **to help rebuild their immune systems.

Richard Burt, a co-author of the study from Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, said that 14 of the 15 patients were insulin-free for some time following the treatment. Eleven of those were able to dispense with supplemental insulin immediately following the infusion of [their own] stem cells and have not had recourse to synthetic insulin since then, he said.

“Two other patients needed some supplemental insulin for 12 and 20 months after the procedure, but eventually both were able to wean themselves from taking daily shots,” he added. One patient went 12 months without shots, but relapsed a year after treatment after suffering a viral infection, and resumed daily insulin injections. Another volunteer was eliminated from the study because of complications. The therapy, known as autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, has already shown benefits to individuals with a range of auto-immune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease and lupus.

There are still question marks about exactly how the treatment works, and **further studies will be required to fully evaluate it’s safety and efficacy. **
“As a research scientist I am always hesitant to speak of a cure, but the initial results have been good and show the importance of conducting more trials,” Dr Burt said.

Given the right funding opportunities, university hospitals in London could be conducting research into the therapy within the next 12 months, he added.

“It will probably be five to eight years before we see a treatment being widely available,” he said.

…, Dr Jay Skyler, of the Diabetes Research Institute at the University of Miami, wrote: “Research in this field is likely to explode in the next few years and should include randomised controlled trials, as well as mechanistic studies."
 
This is wonderful news! Futher evidence that embryonic stem-cell research is not only unethical and immoral, but a complete waste of time and money.

It seems that every day we learn of new breakthrough therapies, like this one, emerging from the use of ADULT stem-cells, while at the same time we are told over and over again that embryonic stem-cell research holds more promise, even though the field has never resulted in even one single theraputic breakthrough, ever.

When will we come to the inevitible realization that using embryos in that way only serves to kill embryos? Nothing more. Clearly we should realocate the money and energy wasted on embryonic stem-cell research into fruitful endeavors like ADULT stem-cell reasearch.
 
good and bad.

adult stem cells - good
some notable benefits - good
chemo, immune supression drugs, spinal tap, reduced immune system - very very bad.


that is a very scary and risky procedure they just blithly describe and I doubt they would ever have received consent for it in the U.S.

My dh has been diabetic since age 5 (or is it 6? I forget) and he would not be willing to do that at this point, nor would he sign his kid up for it. Shots are hell and reactions are scary, but they are the lesser concern to that treatment at this point.

Maybe someday they will have a better treatment that is more practical in application. Currently, this is a very manageable and treatable disease and that is a very risky procedure to undertake in comparison.

**By the way, this is not new either. Great Britian has been running clinical trials trying to perfect this and get longer results for over 7 years now. **
 
I’m a type 1 diabetic, so I try to keep up on things. A couple of things need to be pointed out with this study. I do think it is a step in the right direction, but it is not the breakthough that is needed.
  1. It wasn’t approved in the US because of the risk involved.
  2. It doesn’t address the problem of what caused the diabetes in the first place. What is to keep the body from re-developing the same auto-immune response as before? Sure the antibodies that currently exist were wiped out in the chemo, but why were they there to begin with.
  3. It only works for newly diagnosed type 1. Which while is still good, leaves a lot of the people in the dark. I would be happy (and jealous) for anyone that didn’t have to live with this disease.
  4. Near normal control can be achieved with medical technology that currently exists without the great risk.
I was going though some things that I found in a box that I was unpacking. I found an article that my mother clipped out of the paper for me from 1995 that said how this study in Canada was successful and the procedure could cure diabetes. Here we are 12 years later, and that study is all but forgotten. While I look forward to seeing studies, I see no sense in getting hopes up until the procedures, devices, medicines are for the general public.

I probably said too much, but oh well, everyone knows my issues.
 
Vluvski, here is the link for the article.

timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article1637528.ece

*1. It wasn’t approved in the US because of the risk involved. **As the article indicates the treatment is still in clinical trials and
further studies will be required to fully evaluate it’s safety and efficacy.
“It will probably be five to eight years before we see a treatment being widely available,” he said. *

Wouldn’t it have been great if the contraceptive pill and the drug thalidomide had been subjected to such stringent tests before being approved for sale!
 
wait ya mean they are auctuly making prgress with adult stem cells?

whoda thought that 🤷
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top