K
Kmon23
Guest
I understand there are different types of grace in Catholic theology (actual vs. habitual). There is also sacramental, efficient, etc.
My Orthodox acquaintances say they don’t have a distinction in the types of grace, and that grace is just grace.
So what is the nature of the distinction of grace in Catholic theology? Is it based on the effects/consequence, the object it is affecting, or the essence of the grace is different for the different kinds of grace? Why is there a distinction that makes sacramental grace different than habitual grace, and why is there a distinction in types of grace in Catholic theology?
My Orthodox acquaintances say they don’t have a distinction in the types of grace, and that grace is just grace.
So what is the nature of the distinction of grace in Catholic theology? Is it based on the effects/consequence, the object it is affecting, or the essence of the grace is different for the different kinds of grace? Why is there a distinction that makes sacramental grace different than habitual grace, and why is there a distinction in types of grace in Catholic theology?