J
Jennifer123
Guest
guardian.co.uk/medicine/story/0,1710735,00.html
Women who are less than nine weeks pregnant can safely have medical abortions at home, according to the head of a government-backed pilot project.
Abortion services for the 20,000 women who seek a chemically induced abortion every year could be transformed should the Department of Health’s official evaluation of the pilot confirm initial findings. But it is also likely to provoke controversy from anti-abortion campaigners who will claim that home abortions would make the procedure easier and therefore lead to more women having terminations.
Sure - fully safe except for the additional risk of cancers and mental health disorders. But the medical establishment truly cares about “womens health” enough to cover up known risks about abortion.
Women who are less than nine weeks pregnant can safely have medical abortions at home, according to the head of a government-backed pilot project.
Abortion services for the 20,000 women who seek a chemically induced abortion every year could be transformed should the Department of Health’s official evaluation of the pilot confirm initial findings. But it is also likely to provoke controversy from anti-abortion campaigners who will claim that home abortions would make the procedure easier and therefore lead to more women having terminations.
Sure - fully safe except for the additional risk of cancers and mental health disorders. But the medical establishment truly cares about “womens health” enough to cover up known risks about abortion.