Ultrasound images too graphic for newspaper

  • Thread starter Thread starter yochumjy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why would these be graphic? IF someone wants to pay to put them in the paper than the paper should take them. Heck they are a lot tamer than some of the Victoria Secret and Foley underware ads as far as graphicā€¦
 
40.png
Karin:
These are beautiful picturesā€¦not graphic in any senseā€¦unlike this (VERY GRAPHIC)ā€¦ operationrescue.org/photos/main.php?g2_view=core.ShowItem&g2_itemId=2626
Click to expand...
Maybe if they showed a picture like this in sex education classes, it would stick in the minds of young ladies. It might even stop a few from aborting a baby some day. But of course a picture like that will never be shownā€“itā€™s WAY too informative.
 
The only thing graphic about those ultrasound images is that the unborn babies in them actually look like babies. Maybe thatā€™s what the newspaper is afraid of ā€“ those images will cause quite a bit of discomfort to those who would like to think that the creature growing in the womb is something other than human life.
 
40.png
Marquette:
Maybe if they showed a picture like this in sex education classes, it would stick in the minds of young ladies. It might even stop a few from aborting a baby some day. But of course a picture like that will never be shownā€“itā€™s WAY too informative.
Click to expand...
hmmmā€¦everything has its placeā€¦and the photo in the link I provided has no place IMHO in schools or anywhere ā€œlittleā€ kids can see them!
 
To the original poster with the first link, those are awesome picsā€¦ I honestly think that if some group had paid for them, they should run them.

As for the link with Operation Rescueā€™s ā€œTruth Truckā€ā€¦ there is no way that ā€œlittleā€ kids could avoid something that large, however, I believe that pictures like that should be shown to @8th graders on up. Itā€™ll make them think again about abortion. I was in the 10th grade when I saw a video about teen pregnancy and the ā€œoptionsā€ and abortion was the first one. And it wasnā€™t a graphic videoā€¦ it was all about ā€œher choice- the father didnā€™t want ā€˜itā€™ā€ and it evoked feelings of sorrow for her because she stated that once in awhile she feels sorrow at what the baby ā€œmightā€ have been. That feeling sat with me for yearsā€¦ until I learned how post-abortive women REALLY feelā€¦ and that sorrow that the teen in the video showed was a mockery.

Soā€¦ with that saidā€¦ children- as young as mentally capable of handling such graphic information- should see that picture so they have NO misunderstanding as to what abortion is.
just my two cents. :o
 
So far gone are those that protest life, that the first most natural images of lifeā€™s beginning is now offending them.
 
In NZ the Family Planning Assn show 13 year-olds a video of a woman giving birth screaming her head off. Talk about indoctrinating against having babies.

If children were routinely shown beautiful photos of pre-natal development and ultrasounds from a very early age, along with discussion, it could help to teach them about the sacredness of life.
 
Eileen T:
In NZ the Family Planning Assn show 13 year-olds a video of a woman giving birth screaming her head off. Talk about indoctrinating against having babies.

If children were routinely shown beautiful photos of pre-natal development and ultrasounds from a very early age, along with discussion, it could help to teach them about the sacredness of life.
Click to expand...
Those who corrupt the young are amongst the gravest of sinners.

:mad:
 
Yes they are too graphic for the Culture of Perversion to stomach. The pictures would further weaken their position and they cannot afford that to happen. They are despirate and it shows.

PF
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top