He did pretty well when explaining Peronism in the sense that it has gone through different “motions”. Sounded quite fair and not stagnant as many articles are.He could interpret the changes, nuances. That was good.
As far as the Teología del Pueblo, belonging here, one can understand through all that happened how these movements came to be.
How much influence? After all these years and looking back, so much water has gone under the bridge since then…
And yet here we are struggling … as always economically speaking . That was fair also. We were incredibly well positioned, we have natural resources and still… towing and rowing.
I am glad it helped. We really come from a context for good and bad but always forward.