Being Jewish, I can add something that I know from my study of the New American Bible and the Catechism of the Catholic Church agrees with Church teachings and will help answer your question. Sorry that it has no references to Trent Horn’s work, however.
The Old Testament or Jewish Scriptures often rely heavily upon the anthropomorphism of God. This refers to attributing traits, emotions, and sometimes physical aspects of human beings to the Divine.
In the Judeo-Christian tradition, God, in reality, transcends these traits. However, we often find in Old Testament Scripture examples of God acting quite human, sometimes being spoken of as having regret for feelings or actions, as having arms and hands, even having “face-to-face” communication with prophets–especially Moses.
Instead of debating whether or not God literally spoke from the heavens with each and every prophet (because God can obviously do whatever God wishes), the question to ask is: “Did God speak to each and every prophet as written in Scripture?” Especially in the case of texts like Jonah where the narrative is clearly meant to be read more as a parable with a moral than a historical text, what are we to think?
If a prophet wrote in a genre of lore to teach a religious lesson, a composition with little or no historicity, did God ever really speak as written in the text? How are we to know? It is clear that when a Biblical writer says that God has hands that God clearly has no real physical hands, right? How then do we know when God spoke aloud historically?
Judeo-Christian tradition is of the general opinion that outside of Moses (and of course Jesus for Christians), God did not literally communicate with anyone as it is specifically written in Scripture texts. There are, of course, short times in Old Testament history and examples in the New Testament where it may be said God is communicating directly, but for the most part, Scripture writers are being inspired to write the best way humans can understand what we believe God is saying in certain situations. It is again an anthropomorphic device.
This is what scholars, both Christian and Jewish, often teach about God’s “words” in the Jewish Bible. Even when the Prophets are speaking and saying things like, “thus saith the Lord,” the prophet is moved by inspiration to say what they understand from a human perspective what God wants. There was likely no voice from heaven in any of these cases, though the narrative device is written as a dialogue between God and mortals.
To reiterate, Jews generally believe that Moses is the only person to have spoken directly with God, and Christians believe that both Moses and Jesus of Nazareth have had such a dialogue. All other times, the communication was by inspiration, whether written or live as when prophets were speaking and delivering messages to the nations of Israel and Judah.
