The writings of C. S. Lewis or G. K. Chesterton’s book “Orthodoxy” give a context for understanding religious positions. In today’s Media, Mormons or cults are labelled “conservative” but should be described as radical, in the sense they make an extreme break from Christian orthodox teaching. Likewise, Catholics who reject Vatican II are described as conservative, but the relevant fact is that they are rejecting Catholic orthodoxy, by rejecting the Magisterium. People who support the right to abortion, to kill disabled infants, or support homosexual relationships are labelled as liberals, but actually they want to turn back the clock to the time before Christianity, when these things had been accepted. The secularists are the ones who push the liberal/conservative dicotomy, because they want us to accept their mindset, rather than Christian doctrine. The liberal/conservative lingo tempts us to evaluate religion from the secular view, when we should be looking at the world, from the viewpoint of Christian orthodoxy. I would put Huffpost, BU, the National Council of Churches, NETWORK, National Catholic Reporter, and the Jehovah’s Witnesses on one side of the fence, since they reject Christian orthodoxy. On the other side of the fence, I put most Catholics, Protestants, and EO who sincerely hold to the common core of fixed Christian beliefs, that some things are absolutely true or false, right or wrong. They aren’t for or against change, they are for Someone else, and for people.