United Nations Report: Making Abortion Illegal Doesn't Increase Women's Deaths

[WanderAimlessly]

More lies from the UN:

**United Nations Report: Making Abortion Illegal Doesn’t Increase Women’s Deaths
**by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
February 20, 2006

New York, NY (LifeNews.com) – Abortion advocates made the argument to legalize abortion in the United States and they make the same one to topple pro-life laws in other nations: making abortion illegal will increase women’s deaths. However, a new report from the United Nations indicates that’s just not so.

According to new figures from the United Nations Populations Division, nations with laws legalizing abortion have not seen a corresponding drop in the rate of maternal deaths.

Full Story

PF

 

[Flopfoot]

What do you mean more lies from the UN? This is truth at last from the UN, it is good news, it is saying that abortion is not helping when it comes to keeping women alive.

Now that the UN has admitted it, how long will it take for the pro-abortion lobby to admit it? This was always one of their main arguments, that if we make abortion illegal more women will die. I for one will be very glad if I never hear that completely false assertion again.

 

[BlindSheep]

I wouldn’t be so sure we won’t hear that assertion again, after all, liberals don’t exactly have a great track record when it comes to acknowledging facts.

 

[vluvski]

Perhaps I’m missing something- what exactly is the lie? I think this is positive news, as it refutes one of the pro-abortion arguments.

 

[RCCDefender]

Maybe WanderAimlessly got confussed??

 

[Horab]

well if this report is true it means the un got something right

i really hope this is the case, i’m tired of hearing about coat hangars and other gross pro-choice rhetoric, that’s a poor argument in the first place.

 

[The_Adversery]

Why is Liberal apparently a dirty word around these parts?

 

[mapleoak]

i really hope this is the case, i’m tired of hearing about coat hangars and other gross pro-choice rhetoric, that’s a poor argument in the first place.

Backstreet dope dealers performing abortions in the alley with coat hangers are nothing but a myth perpetuated by the pro-death camps to create hysteria. It generally discredits the objectiveness of those arguing the pro-abortion philosophy early on.

 

[wapsi]

Why is Liberal apparently a dirty word around these parts?

Because the membership of CAF is heavily conservative. There are a few liberals who keep a presence here, but most wither in the face of unrelenting opposition.

BTW, this thread is two years old. Generally the moderators prefer that we start a new thread, rather than resurrect an old one, since many of the previous participants may no longer be here to defend their views.

 

[Feedmysheep]

. Generally the moderators prefer that we start a new thread, rather than resurrect an old one, since many of the previous participants may no longer be here to defend their views.

Yes, but judging from the nature of “The Adversery”'s other 22 posts, it seems we have a troll on our hands, and not someone who, you know, bothers reading forum guidelines and rules.

 

[rlg94086]

Yes, but judging from the nature of “The Adversery”'s other 22 posts, it seems we have a troll on our hands, and not someone who, you know, bothers reading forum guidelines and rules.

…would that include the forum rule that says we aren’t to accuse someone of being a “troll?”:ehh: :tsktsk:

I would say though that there are liberals on CAF who apparently consider “conservative”…or worse yet “neo-con” …a dirty word. The Adversery is just displaying normal, run-of-the-mill victimology…typical of liberalism.