Universe or Multiverse

  • Thread starter Thread starter TEPO
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

TEPO

Guest
I believe in the Multiverse because a single universe makes no sense. For the big bang to exist, there needs to have been something ‘there’ -to explode. If something was there, in space, then why should we assume that it was the only thing?

It makes more sense to assume that the force of gravity created a mega-sphere, made of space junk. It makes sense that within the vastness of space, many mega-spheres exist in the same way, and that the gravity of mega-spheres would be an extremely powerful force.

It makes sense that mega-spheres would be attracted to each other due to their extremely powerful gravitational pulls, and it makes sense that if two started moving toward each other, they would gradually begin increasing speed, until they met -and incinerated each other.

It also makes sense that our universe could be the particles from that collision, and that the ‘expanding universe’, is actually the effect of our universe being pulled toward the gravitational pull of another mega-sphere.
 
So basically then, space is filled with collisions of spheres, which incinerate each other into small particles (our universe), and then those particles are gravitationally collected by new mega-spheres, which then collide again and again, over and over for eternity.

…like a never ending chain reaction.
 
I say universe because we still haven’t found the end of the universe (As far as I know).
If there are multiverses then surely there would be some sort of divider between each one.
 
adawgj said:
I say universe because we still haven’t found the end of the universe (As far as I know).
If there are multiverses then surely there would be some sort of divider between each one.
Click to expand...
I think the divider would be huge space-gaps that we would never notice because we are always traveling through one. I also think its telling that there have been no stray space materiels flying across our universe within a split second -because if we are part of a ‘big bang’ explosion, our universe must be traveling very, very fast through space.

…It’s telling because we wouldnt run across any oncoming space material from another incoming universes, because all universes would be on track toward their nearest mega-sphere… And space is very large (infinite), and the megaspheres we came from no longer exist, so re-routes take place.

…anyone ever wonder why galaxies stay separated…? Probably because they are all moving so quickly through space, and because the attraction of the mega-sphere is greater -which keeps them moving separately through spacetime.
 
I believe it was Neil deGrasse Tyson who made the comment something along the lines that people used to think Earth was all there was, until people discovered other planets. People used to think our solar system was the only one, until we discovered others. People used to think our galaxy was the only one, then we discovered others, What makes us think that our universe is the only one?
 
There are several theory’s on this,
the best way to find anything close to the educated facts
Would be to checkout various Universities astronomy departments ,
Their very informative, using this site to ask these questions will only derail your end result
 
TEPO said:
I believe in the Multiverse because a single universe makes no sense. For the big bang to exist, there needs to have been something ‘there’ -to explode. If something was there, in space, then why should we assume that it was the only thing?

It makes more sense to assume that the force of gravity created a mega-sphere, made of space junk. It makes sense that within the vastness of space, many mega-spheres exist in the same way, and that the gravity of mega-spheres would be an extremely powerful force.

It makes sense that mega-spheres would be attracted to each other due to their extremely powerful gravitational pulls, and it makes sense that if two started moving toward each other, they would gradually begin increasing speed, until they met -and incinerated each other.

It also makes sense that our universe could be the particles from that collision, and that the ‘expanding universe’, is actually the effect of our universe being pulled toward the gravitational pull of another mega-sphere.
Click to expand...
What happens to the second law of thermodynamics in the case of a multiverse which is coming from a time which extends into the infinite past?
 
I haven’t read the other replies you got . . . But to speak for myself I should like to think that multiverses exist. I know there’s no proof for it but there’s no proof against it either.
Such an exciting field and time in human history! And we’re just getting started.
However no offense but I find flaw in your reasoning for the impossibility of a universe. Ive got little time so i won’t try to explain, but I’m sure the others will or already have
 
Multiverses could exist which are only a tiny distance away from each other in a direction perpendicular to the three directions of space and one of time that are familiar to us. A nearby multiverse might be only an Ångström (to name an example of small distance that’s a fairly common cliché) away, but if it never touched the manifold of our universe, we might never know.

There could be an infinite number of perpendicular directions from the three (with time being movement along a fourth) we know, and when we do quantum interference experiments, the interference of, say, an electron with itself might really be the interference of the electron in our universe with its shadowy electronic doppelgangers in a multiplicity of unseen parallel universes. Being quantum, they might make an ever so slight journey across the perpendicular void into our universe and then immediately head for home, leaving only the “self”-interference pattern of the electron in our universe as evidence of their shadowy existence.

What I have just ever so briefly limned out is the scenario depicted in the opening pages of The Fabric of Reality: The Science of Parallel Universes – and Its Implications by David Deutsch.
 
TEPO said:
I believe in the Multiverse because a single universe makes no sense. For the big bang to exist, there needs to have been something ‘there’ -to explode. If something was there, in space, then why should we assume that it was the only thing?

It makes more sense to assume that the force of gravity created a mega-sphere, made of space junk. It makes sense that within the vastness of space, many mega-spheres exist in the same way, and that the gravity of mega-spheres would be an extremely powerful force.

It makes sense that mega-spheres would be attracted to each other due to their extremely powerful gravitational pulls, and it makes sense that if two started moving toward each other, they would gradually begin increasing speed, until they met -and incinerated each other.

It also makes sense that our universe could be the particles from that collision, and that the ‘expanding universe’, is actually the effect of our universe being pulled toward the gravitational pull of another mega-sphere.
Click to expand...
Are we, as Catholics, allowed to believe in the multiverse? Does it contradict our faith?
 
TEPO said:
I believe in the Multiverse because a single universe makes no sense. For the big bang to exist, there needs to have been something ‘there’ -to explode. If something was there, in space, then why should we assume that it was the only thing?

It makes more sense to assume that the force of gravity created a mega-sphere, made of space junk. It makes sense that within the vastness of space, many mega-spheres exist in the same way, and that the gravity of mega-spheres would be an extremely powerful force.

It makes sense that mega-spheres would be attracted to each other due to their extremely powerful gravitational pulls, and it makes sense that if two started moving toward each other, they would gradually begin increasing speed, until they met -and incinerated each other.

It also makes sense that our universe could be the particles from that collision, and that the ‘expanding universe’, is actually the effect of our universe being pulled toward the gravitational pull of another mega-sphere.
Click to expand...
Dear TEPO:

Many mega-spheres would not constitute a multiverse if the same “laws” worked for all of them.

On the other hand, if it is not possible to develop a unified set of laws that can describe what we have been calling so far “our universe”, then it is actually a multiverse.

Best regards
JuanFlorencio
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top