Unpardonable Sin and Catholics

  • Thread starter Thread starter jesse_james
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

jesse_james

Guest
How do Catholics view the “unpardonable sin”? In other words, “blasphemy against the Holy Spirit”?

I know the general consensus from a Protestant perspective, but how does the Catholic Church interpret this?

Thanks guys, peace. I’ve been meaning to ask this for a few days now.
 
How do Catholics view the “unpardonable sin”? In other words, “blasphemy against the Holy Spirit”?

I know the general consensus from a Protestant perspective, but how does the Catholic Church interpret this?

Thanks guys, peace. I’ve been meaning to ask this for a few days now.
I think it might be good if you share this “general consensus from a Protestant perspective”.
 
I think it might be good if you share this “general consensus from a Protestant perspective”.
I’m so glad you posed this question. I’ve always wondered what that big 'Sin against the Holy Spirit" is. It’s mentioned but I’ve never actually seen an explanation of what it is. I pray that it’s not a sin I’ve ever committed and that’s what scares me most then anything. This sin means eternal damnation with no pardon. I’m sure there are many that would want this information.

Blessings this day

:coffeeread:
 
How do Catholics view the “unpardonable sin”? In other words, “blasphemy against the Holy Spirit”?

I know the general consensus from a Protestant perspective, but how does the Catholic Church interpret this?

Thanks guys, peace. I’ve been meaning to ask this for a few days now.
an excerpt from new advent;
It is to be noted that according to the definition (1) blasphemy is set down as a word, for ordinarily it is expressed in speech, though it may be committed in thought or in act. Being primarily a sin of the tongue, it will be seen to be opposed directly to the religious act of praising God. (2) It is said to be against God, though this may be only mediately, as when the contumelious word is spoken of the saints or of sacred things, because of the relationship they sustain to God and His service. It doesn’t have to be against the Holy Spirit individually, but against God in any or all of the Trinity.
 
How do Catholics view the “unpardonable sin”? In other words, “blasphemy against the Holy Spirit”?

I know the general consensus from a Protestant perspective, but how does the Catholic Church interpret this?

Thanks guys, peace. I’ve been meaning to ask this for a few days now.
It would be the sin of refusing God or refusing the prompts of the Holy Spirit, to the point of death not believing that God can save us.
 
It would be the sin of refusing God or refusing the prompts of the Holy Spirit, to the point of death not believing that God can save us.
Yes and the way I was taught in my protestant days was that the only unpardonable sin was the unrepented sin.

Which I think is what the Church says. You can not be cleansed of sin if you do not repent of it.
 
How do Catholics view the “unpardonable sin”? In other words, “blasphemy against the Holy Spirit”?

I know the general consensus from a Protestant perspective, but how does the Catholic Church interpret this?

Thanks guys, peace. I’ve been meaning to ask this for a few days now.
CCC 1864 “Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven.” There are no limits to the mercy of God, but anyone who deliberately refuses to accept his mercy by repenting, rejects the forgiveness of his sins and the salvation offered by the Holy Spirit. Such hardness of heart can lead to final impenitence and eternal loss.
 
CCC 1864 “Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven.” There are no limits to the mercy of God, but anyone who deliberately refuses to accept his mercy by repenting, rejects the forgiveness of his sins and the salvation offered by the Holy Spirit. Such hardness of heart can lead to final impenitence and eternal loss.
Yeah, that’s how the Protestants pretty much teach it–albeit, with slightly different phrasing. Thanks for clearing that up.

In response to the other posters:
According to (most) Protestants, one can only commit this sin through a lifetime of denying the grace and forgiveness offered by God through the Holy Spirit and/or a lifetime of attributing the good of the Holy Spirit to the work of satan (only some mention the latter, probably due the Biblical reference it comes from).

If you feel guilty about committing this sin, then there’s a good chance you haven’t committed it. Say, if someone blasphemy’s the Holy Spirit in a fit of rage or simply out sheer ignorance and then later humbles themselves, truly repents and accepts the grace of God through the Holy Spirit, they will be forgiven.
 
(2) It is said to be against God, though this may be only mediately, as when the contumelious word is spoken of the saints or of sacred things, because of the relationship they sustain to God and His service. It doesn’t have to be against the Holy Spirit individually, but against God in any or all of the Trinity.
Sorry for double posting, but I disagree with that point of view. It contradicts scripture:

Matthew 12:31-32 says, “And so I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.”

Luke 12:10 says, “And everyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but anyone who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven.”

Clearly, blasphemy against God or Jesus is distinct from blasphemy against the Holy Spirit? I’m not sure.

What do you guys think?
 
i always thought blasphemy against the holy spirit was saying that the work/miracles of jesus are actually the work of satan/evil and not of god.

unless that was already addressed and i missed it.
 
There are generally believed to be 6 sins that concern blaspheming the Holy Spirit: despair, presumption, impenitence or a fixed determination not to repent, obstinacy [in sin], resisting the known truth, and envy of another’s spiritual welfare.

If one does none of these things one’s grave sins are quite forgivable if repenting and confessing them before they die.

But what is absolutely certain is that final impenitence is absolute. God cannot pardon where there is no repentance, and the moment of death is the instant after which mortal sin can not be remitted. One dieing impenetent in grave sin has thus blasphemed the Holy Spirit by ignoring His incessant call to repent over the entirety of one’s life.

More Here: Holy Spirit

A few descriptions of some of the sins that blaspheme the Holy Spirit:

Despair:
Is the voluntary and complete abandonment of all hope of saving one’s soul and of having the means required for that end. It is not a passive state of mind: on the contrary it involves a positive act of the will by which a person deliberately gives over any expectation of ever reaching eternal life. There is presupposed an intervention of the intellect in virtue of which one comes to decide definitely that salvation is impossible. This last is motived by the persuasion either that the individual’s sins are too great to be forgiven or that it is too hard for human nature to cooperate with the grace of God or that Almighty God is unwilling to aid the weakness or pardon the offenses of his creatures, etc.

It is obvious that a mere anxiety, no matter how acute, as to the hereafter is not to be identified with despair.

Presumption:
It may be defined as the condition of a soul which, because of a badly regulated reliance on God’s mercy and power, hopes for salvation without doing anything to deserve it, or for pardon of his sins without repenting of them. There are generally believed to be 5 ways in which one may be guilty of presumption.
  1. By hoping to obtain by one’s natural powers, unaided, what is definitely supernatural, viz. eternal bliss or the recovery of God’s friendship after grievous sin (this would involve a Pelagian frame of mind);
  2. A person might look to have his sins forgiven without adequate penance (this, likewise, if it were based on a seriously entertained conviction, would seem to carry with it the taint of heresy);
  3. A man might expect some special assistance from Almighty God for the perpetration of crime (this would be blasphemous as well as presumptuous);
  4. One might aspire to certain extraordinary supernatural excellencies, but without any conformity to the determinations of God’s providence. Thus one might aspire to equal in blessedness the Mother of God;
  5. Finally, there is the transgression of those who, whilst they continue to lead a life of sin, are as confident of a happy issue as if they had not lost their baptismal innocence.
Note: There are some fundamentalist Protestants who I believe as a matter of their doctrine are in real danger of falling under #5 in their presumption that they are free to sin (as if an expression of faith) once they think themselves “saved” no matter how objectively evil their deeds. However it may be possible that Invincible Ignorance can mitigate this.

James
 
i always thought blasphemy against the holy spirit was saying that the work/miracles of jesus are actually the work of satan/evil and not of god.

unless that was already addressed and i missed it.
That is blasphemy but not the what the OP was referring to.
 
That is blasphemy but not the what the OP was referring to.
That is, however, the specific thing that Jesus is responding to when he teaches about blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, so indeed the two seem to be connected.

Usagi
 
From Catholic Answers Q&A Nov. 2004:

Q: What is blasphemy or sin against the Spirit? Can it ever be forgiven?

A: It is the refusal to ask for forgiveness, a refusal to repent. “Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, then, is that sin committed by the person who claims to have a ‘right’ to persist in evil—in any sin at all—and who thus rejects redemption” (Dominum et Vivificantem 46).

It is the Holy Spirit who convinces us of our sins for the purpose of repentance. So if he makes us aware of sin and we refuse to repent, then it becomes an unforgivable sin. Of course, if we do repent, then we can be forgiven.

“There are no limits to the mercy of God, but anyone who deliberately refuses to accept his mercy by repenting rejects the forgiveness of his sins and the salvation offered by the Holy Spirit. Such hardness of heart can lead to final impenitence and eternal loss” (CCC1864).
 
i always thought blasphemy against the holy spirit was saying that the work/miracles of jesus are actually the work of satan/evil and not of god.

unless that was already addressed and i missed it.
I always wondered about this. If it is blasphemy to say that the works and/or miracles of Jesus are the work of Satan then isn’t it blasphemy to say that wine is of the devil since Jesus’ first miracle was wine from water? I generally stopped asking my baptist friends about it and even my Methodist ministers were uncomfortable with the question.
 
I always wondered about this. If it is blasphemy to say that the works and/or miracles of Jesus are the work of Satan then isn’t it blasphemy to say that wine is of the devil since Jesus’ first miracle was wine from water? I generally stopped asking my baptist friends about it and even my Methodist ministers were uncomfortable with the question.
I know people who think that alcohol is sinful. I think drunkenness is sinful, but I don’t think alcohol in moderation is sinful in and of itself. Of course if people want to avoid alcohol as it can lead to drunkenness I think it is an acceptable approach.
 
Mat 12:32 And whosoever shall speak a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but he that shall speak against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him neither in this world, nor in the world to come.

How does one get from this statement that Jesus was saying “A lifetime of rejecting the Holy Spirit”

It seems quite clear that he says “he that shall SPEAK against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be forgiven him.”

This seems to be a one time event that someone could commit. This is just my opinion which doesn’t matter much of course.

And it also appears that one would have to speak personally against the Holy Spirit, not just God, or Jesus. It seems there is a difference here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top