Unplanned- A Review

  • Thread starter Thread starter FirstFiveEighth
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

FirstFiveEighth

Guest
With the movie Unplanned coming out this weekend and being in the news over receiving an “R” rating, being blackballed in advertising on mainstream networks, and having its Twitter account toyed with, I thought I’d give my personal review of the movie for anyone who is interested. So here goes.

First off, I have to admit that I usually avoid Christian movies like the plague. The plots are usually overwrought with unbelievable characters, they have bad acting and low budgets. I was wary of this movie also because it was produced by the same people who did “God’s Not Dead” 1&2, which I thought were textbook examples of this problem. However, ‘Unplanned’ was very well done.

As far as production goes, you can tell it had a limited budget to an extent. The acting and dialogue was a mixed bag (mostly good). In a two or so scenes the lines seem to be forced talking points that are delivered woodenly. I am specifically thinking of the PP college booth scene and the outdoor family dinner scene. That is the negative. On the positive side, the actors and actresses were very good and made very believable characters. The main actress playing Abby Johnson is extremely compelling and she does a great job. Also, the lady who plays the PP supervisor is absolutely excellent as the “villain”. FYI she is a former dancer and has been out of acting for 15yrs but agreed to play this part when asked. Also the abortion doctor is actually Dr. Levatino who really did perform abortions. Most importantly, the little flaws don’t take away from the movie because it is a very compelling story delivered well and gives an inside view into how PP operates.

Some other good plot and story points to note:

-The film does not portray all the PP employees as inhuman villains. It shows they care but also how naive they are about what they are doing.
  • It does a good job demonstrating why it is important for prolife advocates to be compassionate to the young women entering the clinic and the employees and how condemning them as inhuman is counterproductive.
-It also does a good job demonstrating the dehumanizing language and policies of PP and also the complete hypocracy of the employees in how they treat some pregnancies.

The “R” rating; This was given for violence/gore. Probably one of the weakest “R” ratings ever given. The “gore” in this movie consists of blood running down legs twice, an out-of-focus shot of a dismembered fetus being reassembled, and red stuff running through tubes. The only other violence occurs on the ultrasound screen. For comparison, all of the Jurassic Park films are rated PG-13. Where people get ripped in half on screen while screaming, and body parts routinely fall on people. Or X-men, where people get beheaded on screen.

Anyways I thought it was a good film well worth seeing with a realistic prolife message. Definitely think teenagers can benefit from it. It even gives some help lines and hotlines at the end before the credits. Don’t listen to the critics- their reviews are garbage. Just check this out:

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

Anyways that’s my quick review for anyone who cares.
 
Last edited:
Thanks. Glad you liked it. I saw it for free last Thursday, but plan on seeing it again
Wednesday.
I did not realize the abortion doctor was once an abortionist.
In my opinion, this movie does not deserve
the “R” rating.
It is doing better at the box office than
expected and this movie was definitely better than God Is Not Dead 1 & 2.
 
Mike Lundell, the My Pillow guy put in $1 million into this; and God Bless him for doing so.

There surely are “deep pockets” on the pro-life side, the thing is, those funds may well go into other projects.

I’ve watched a number of recent films lately. I’m sure I can find blemishes in all of them…criticisms are a bit on all movies. Just read the IMDB reviews for any movie.

I know, I watched a prior movie on abortion, from one of those non-Hollywood companies. It’s a bit unclear, I think it was about an abortion survivor.

Maybe, just perhaps, the standard of some movies is more like a TV movie but so it goes.

Some movies may not have the best production but at times, that is what lends a charm to them.
 
Don’t get me wrong. I only pointed out a few things for the sake of even-handedness. They are very minor and don’t take away from the film. And as you noted all films have flaws.

The production value overall is very good. This isn’t some B level movie. I hope I did not give that impression. In fact it has received an A+ CinemaScore, which on average only happens to two movies a year, across all genres. To put this in perspective, some other A+ movies in the past have been; Black Panther, The Incredibles, Frozen, ET, Lone Survivor, American Sniper, A Few Good Men, The Help, etc. Unplanned is in very good company.
 
I saw the movie also. There were parts that were difficult to watch, but because of the inhumanity of abortion. I could not watch the whole ultrasound piece. In my opinion the R rating was undeserved and most likely the result of pro-abortion actions.

The movie was well done.
 
Also, I saw this last night in another place. I don’t know what it means…
We received an A+ CinemaScore! Only around 2 movies a year receive this. The audience has spoken! “Graced with a coveted A+ CinemaScore, the controversial anti-abortion drama Unplanned opened to a strong $6.1 million…”

For FirstFiveEighth and everyone else.
 
Last edited:
So CinemaScore is a rating metric that is used to determine how much the audience appreciated a movie. It is different from critic ratings on a site like Rotten Tomatoes because it surveys moviegoers themselves and is not an average of professional critic reviews.

It basically is an exit poll that asks the viewer to grade the movie they just saw on an A-F scale and takes demographic data like age, sex, etc. according to CinemaScore, audiences typically grade a movie at a B+. If a movie gets a C grade, then it had some serious flaws the audience did not like and basically flopped. Average scores are in the B range and movies that the audience really liked get As. This can also vary by genre. Apparently good horror movies get graded as Cs. A+ ratings are rare and as noted on average are only granted twice a year.

A good CinemaScore is considered a success because it surveys the target audience, as opposed to critics who may not even care for the genre or have biases against the subject matter. This movie is a kind of textbook case of that phenomenon, where the professional critics have panned the movie, and all their reviews talk about how the movie isn’t true.
 
Last edited:
Yes I did not realize that about the doctor in the movie, either, he is now pro-life.
 
Obviously there are nitpicks about the movie even from the Pro-life side, and it won’t win any Oscars. It was made on a small budget.
Still: I thought it was very well done. What I liked about it was that it showed the pro-choice people and planned Parenthood employees in a sympathetic light, as ordinary people who honestly felt they were helping women. Abby Johnson herself worked for Planned Parenthood, and developed a relationship with her co-workers, and this comes out in the movie.
On the other hand, her higher-up, Cheryl;, while in a way coming out a bit of a 2 dimensional villain on the one hand, on the other, I myself have worked in places where the higher ups are all about the bottom line. she is all about the money the bottom line.
And that’s why these types are promoted to these positions. Cheryl makes the comment in the movie about places that sell hamburgers the hamburger aren’t what makes the money but the fries and soft drinks, and abortion is Planned Parenthood’s fires and soft drinks. so sell abortions!!!
I definitely recommend it.
 
Last edited:
Anyone reading that review would be able to see the criticism is based only on the pro-choice angle of the reviewer.
 
I 'm suspecting the MPAA was pressured by Planned Parenthood to give Unplanned an R rating. I’m definitely watching this when it comes to DVD.
 
I 'm suspecting the MPAA was pressured by Planned Parenthood to give Unplanned an R rating. I’m definitely watching this when it comes to DVD.
Roger & Me, Michael Moore’s initial documentary, was given an R rating due to a scene where a woman kills a rabbit for food. I can’t say that Mr. Moore was very happy about the R rating.
 
On the other hand, her higher-up, Cheryl;, while in a way coming out a bit of a 2 dimensional villain on the one hand, on the other, I myself have worked in places where the higher ups are all about the bottom line. she is all about the money the bottom line.
And that’s why these types are promoted to these positions. Cheryl makes the comment in the movie about places that sell hamburgers the hamburger aren’t what makes the money but the fries and soft drinks, and abortion is Planned Parenthood’s fires and soft drinks. so sell abortions!!!
I listened to an interview with Abby Johnson and the actress, and they said that the character Cheryl was actually toned down a bit for the movie as a “kindness” compared to the real Cheryl. She really did say and do all those things and really was cold and calculating like that.
 
Last edited:
If you have adolescents, I recommend you take them to see this. Get the message in their heads early.

I took my 12-year-old daughter. At first, I had a huge surge of Mommy Guilt. It’s a hecka lot easier for me to explain birds and bees to my children than to tell them about violent acts and how cruel the world can be.

We both left the cinema as tear-stained as everyone else in the audience, (it was in one of the smaller cinemas but pretty crowded, especially for a third-week showing!) During our somber car-ride home, she said, “Mom? You know how Abby was lying to all of those women about abortion? I’m so glad I saw this movie because now nobody can lie to me like that.”

Mission. Accomplished. Score one, Mom!

0c63c39e37fec41b27e32e00e6d4d278ab1eb45d.gif
 
Last edited:
Ann Hornaday, the main reviewer for the Washington Post explains the lack of critical reviews

https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...d3ed7eb3957_story.html?utm_term=.f08f924effc3

They had an advance showing in NY and LA, but didn’t alert a lot of reviewers. Critics were not sent a link, which seems to be standard. She comes to the conclusion that this was intentional, a sort of anti-marketing marketing. It certainly wasn’t a conspiracy on behalf of reviewers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top