F
floresco
Guest
Edward Peters, a canon lawyer with a website on the topic writes:“In practice”? Can you provide any documents that support this?
It is my understanding that “danger of death” is not to be interpreted broadly.
Just because a person lives in a place where there is no priest can not be interpreted in any way as “danger of death”. Africa is a pretty big place and not knowing the exact area and circumstances we can not know if such is true.
We do not know the person’s situation. He, however, knows his own situation. If he thinks that he is in danger of death, then, for purposes of canon law, that counts.The phrase “in danger of death” is not defined in canon law, but, clearly, extreme interpretations should be avoided. It is not necessary to be at death’s door before being considered in danger of death.