Vatican Document on Evangelization in English

  • Thread starter Thread starter RomanRevert
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

RomanRevert

Guest
I do not recall seeing the link to the English version of the full document, so I am posting it HERE.

Here is the section on “Ecumenical Implications” :

IV. Some ecumenical implications
  1. From its beginnings, the ecumenical movement has been closely connected with evangelization. Unity, in fact, is the seal of the credibility of missionary activity and so the Second Vatican Council noted with regret that the scandal of division “damages the most sacred cause of preaching”.43 Jesus himself, on the night before his death, prayed “that they all may be one, so that the world may believe” (Jn 17:21).
The mission of the Church is universal and is not restricted to specific regions of the earth. Evangelization, however, is undertaken differently according to the different situations in which it occurs. In its precise sense, evangelization is the missio ad gentes directed to those who do not know Christ. In a wider sense, it is used to describe ordinary pastoral work, while die phrase “new evangelization” designates pastoral outreach to those who no longer practice the Christian faith,44 In addition, there is evangelization in countries where non-Catholic Christians live, including those with an ancient Christian Tradition and culture. In this context, what is required is both true respect for the tradition and spiritual riches of such countries as well as a sincere spirit of cooperation. Catholics, “avoiding every form of indifferentism or confusion, as well as senseless rivalry, through a common profession of faith in God and in Jesus Christ before all peoples - insofar as this is possible - may collaborate with their separated brethren in social, cultural, technical and religious matters in accordance with the Decree on Ecumenism”.45

Different dimensions of the work of ecumenism can be distinguished: above all, there is listening, as a fundamental condition for any dialogue, then, theological discussion, in which, by seeking to understand the beliefs, traditions and convictions of others, agreement can be found, at times hidden under disagreement. Inseparably united with this is another essential dimension of the ecumenical commitment: witness and proclamation of elements which are not particular traditions or theological subtleties, but which belong rather to the Tradition of the faith itself.

Ecumenism does not have only an institutional dimension aimed at “making the partial communion existing between Christians grow towards full communion in truth and charity”.46 It is also the task of every member of the faithful, above all by means of prayer, penance, study and cooperation. Everywhere and always, each Catholic has the right and the duty to give the witness and the full proclamation of his faith. With non-Catholic Christians, Catholics must enter into a respectful dialogue of charity and truth, a dialogue which is not only an exchange of ideas, but also of gifts,47 in order that the fullness of the means of salvation can be offered to one’s partners in dialogue.48 In this way. they are led to an ever deeper conversion to Christ.

In this connection, it needs also to be recalled that if a non-Catholic Christian, for reasons of conscience and having been convinced of Catholic truth, asks to enter into the full communion of the Catholic Church, this is to be respected as the work of the Holy Spirit and as an expression of freedom of conscience and of religion. In such a case, ii would not be a question of proselytism in the negative sense that has been attributed to this term.48 As explicitly recognized in the Decree on Ecumenism of the Second Vatican Council, “it is evident that the wok of preparing and reconciling those individuals who desire full Catholic communion is of its nature distinct from ecumenical action, but there is no opposition between the two, since both proceed from the marvelous ways of God” 50 Therefore, the work of ecumenism does not remove the right or take away the responsibility of proclaiming in fullness the Catholic faith to other Christians, who freely wish to receive it.

This perspective naturally requires the avoidance of any undue Pressure: “in spreading religious faith and introducing religious practices, everyone should refrain at all times from any kind of action which might seem to suggest coercion or dishonest or improper persuasion, especially when dealing with poor or uneducated people”.51 The witness to the truth does not seek to impose anything by force, neither by coercive action nor by tactics incompatible with the Gospel. By definition, the exercise of charity is free. 52 Love and witnessing to the truth are aimed above all at convincing others through the power of the word of God (Cf 1 Cor 2:3-5; 1 Thess 2:3-5)53 The Christian mission resides in the power of the Holy Spirit and in the truth itself which is proclaimed.
 
After my first read I think I need to call my Protestant friends and tell them to remain Protestant. There is no longer a need to convert to the Catholic Church. Conversion now means conversion to Christ but not to His Church.

From the document:
"Generally, the term **conversion is used in reference to bringing pagans into the Church. However, conversion (metanoia), in its precisely Christian meaning, signifies a change in thinking and in acting, as the expression of the new life in Christ proclaimed by faith: a continuous reform of thought and deeds directed at an ever more intense identification with Christ **(cf Gal 2:20), to which the baptized are called before all else, This is, in the first place, the meaning of the call made by Jesus himself: “repent and believe in the Gospel” (Mk 1:15; cf Mt 4:17

Only once in this writing can I find Catholic and Church used together as in Catholic Church. I am sure that a Protestant reading this will have no desire to convert. It is no longer necessary.
Not suprised to see that all of the foonotes are from Vatican II and up to the present. Nothing from any Pope before Vatican II.
If I have missed something, please point it out.

Cardinal Walter Kasper had it right all along:
“… today we no longer understand ecumenism in the sense of a return, by which the others would ‘be converted’ and return to being Catholics. This was expressly abandoned by Vatican II.”
 
After my first read I think I need to call my Protestant friends and tell them to remain Protestant. There is no longer a need to convert to the Catholic Church. Conversion now means conversion to Christ but not to His Church.

From the document:
"Generally, the term **conversion is used in reference to bringing pagans into the Church. However, conversion (metanoia), in its precisely Christian meaning, signifies a change in thinking and in acting, as the expression of the new life in Christ proclaimed by faith: a continuous reform of thought and deeds directed at an ever more intense identification with Christ **(cf Gal 2:20), to which the baptized are called before all else, This is, in the first place, the meaning of the call made by Jesus himself: “repent and believe in the Gospel” (Mk 1:15; cf Mt 4:17

Only once in this writing can I find Catholic and Church used together as in Catholic Church. I am sure that a Protestant reading this will have no desire to convert. It is no longer necessary.
Not suprised to see that all of the foonotes are from Vatican II and up to the present. Nothing from any Pope before Vatican II.
If I have missed something, please point it out.

Cardinal Walter Kasper had it right all along:
“… today we no longer understand ecumenism in the sense of a return, by which the others would ‘be converted’ and return to being Catholics. This was expressly abandoned by Vatican II.”
Granted, it is the usual wishy-washy what-is-he-tryng-to-say Vatico-babble that seems to be in each and every post-Conciliar document, but I thought that it did say in a couple of places that we as Catholics should share our faith w/ the non-Catholic Christians… just not in a coercive way:

"Everywhere and always, each Catholic has the right and the duty to give the witness and the full proclamation of his faith. With non-Catholic Christians, Catholics must enter into a respectful dialogue of charity and truth, a dialogue which is not only an exchange of ideas, but also of gifts,47 in order that the fullness of the means of salvation can be offered to one’s partners in dialogue.48 In this way. they are led to an ever deeper conversion to Christ."

Wait a minute … I thought we already had the fullness of truth in the Faith. I can only assume that he is referring here to our sharing of our faith so that the non-Catholic can see the fullness of Faith. In terms of the Faith, there is nothing that Protestants can offer that we do not already have, so I am not sure as to what exactly is being exchanged!

“In this connection, it needs also to be recalled that if a non-Catholic Christian, for reasons of conscience and having been convinced of Catholic truth, asks to enter into the full communion of the Catholic Church, this is to be respected as the work of the Holy Spirit and as an expression of freedom of conscience and of religion. In such a case, ii would not be a question of proselytism in the negative sense that has been attributed to this term.48 As explicitly recognized in the Decree on Ecumenism of the Second Vatican Council, “it is evident that the wok of preparing and reconciling those individuals who desire full Catholic communion is of its nature distinct from ecumenical action, but there is no opposition between the two, since both proceed from the marvelous ways of God” 50 Therefore, the work of ecumenism does not remove the right or take away the responsibility of proclaiming in fullness the Catholic faith to other Christians, who freely wish to receive it.

That last part was excellent … not only do we have a right to proclaim our Catholic faith to the non-Catholic … we have a responsibility.

Overall, I don’t think that it is that bad … I do wish they would worry less about offending non-Catholics and worry more about ensuring that the Faith is presented in a true and uncompromising way. If they are offended, so be it. Truth hurts sometimes.

And, by the way, Cardinal Kasper is DEAD WRONG and is perilously close to HERESY with his comments like that. (I know that you were being sarcastic 😉 )
 
Granted, it is the usual wishy-washy what-is-he-tryng-to-say Vatico-babble that seems to be in each and every post-Conciliar document, but I thought that it did say in a couple of places that we as Catholics should share our faith w/ the non-Catholic Christians… just not in a coercive way:
"Everywhere and always, each Catholic has the right and the duty to give the witness and the full proclamation of his faith.
 
The tone of this document highlights an objection I received from a sincere man who really wanted to be Catholic - “Why be Catholic then?” HE WANTED TO HEAR THAT CHALLENGING GOSPEL OF SALVATION… for some reason its swept under the rug in terms that can easy lend themselves to relativism and subjectivism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top