D
DoxieMama
Guest
If someone going through RCIA decides Catholicism is not for them, are they destined for Hell? What constitutes one having vincible versus invincible ignorance? 
Deliberately rejecting the Catholic Faith is objectively a grave sin. However, to be condemned to Hell a person must die unrepentant from actual mortal sin. The sin must be grave AND include full knowledge of the grave immorality of the act and full deliberation (full consent) in committing the act.If someone going through RCIA decides Catholicism is not for them, are they destined for Hell? What constitutes one having vincible versus invincible ignorance?![]()
Wilful, proceeding from the will. It is requisite that the thing be an effect of the will consequent upon actual knowledge, either formal or virtual, in the rational agent. It is not quite the same as free; for a free act supposes self-determination proceeding from an agent capable, at the time, of determining himself or not at his choice. However, as every specific voluntary act in this life is also free (except those rare will-impulses, when man is swept to sudden action without time to perceive in non-action the element of good requisite for determination not to act) the moralist commonly uses the terms voluntary and free interchangeably. A thing may be voluntary in itself, as when in its own proper concept it falls under the efficacious determination of the agent, or voluntary in something else, as in its cause. Voluntary in cause requires foreknowledge of the effect, at least virtual, viz. under a general concept of effects to follow; and production thereof by virtue of the will’s efficiency exercised in the willing of its cause.If someone going through RCIA decides Catholicism is not for them, are they destined for Hell? What constitutes one having vincible versus invincible ignorance?![]()
No.If someone going through RCIA decides Catholicism is not for them, are they destined for Hell? What constitutes one having vincible versus invincible ignorance?![]()